Letter to the editor: Re-examining the role of deep learning in cyber forensics: Practical gaps beyond conceptual frameworks

This letter investigates the applicability of deep learning-based techniques proposed for cyber forensics by exploring its practical limitations. Although current models depict disciplined investigation process stages, there are a lot of issues that still exist in real-world utilization. Primary concerns are data quality and bias, lack of forensic-grade validation of the method, low explainability of model outputs, and risk to evidence integrity when performing automated comparison. The debate also draws attention to the necessity of generalizing existing methodologies from post-incident review to forensic readiness and real-time monitoring. The paper contends that deep learning tools ought to serve as, not substitute for, expert judgment, with appropriate safeguards for transparency, accountability and legal admissibility. Resolving these problems is important as bridging conceptual and physical understanding with dependable forensic process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Synergy
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2026.100669
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letter to the editor: Re-examining the role of deep learning in cyber forensics: Practical gaps beyond conceptual frameworks

Shital Yashwant Waware, Sandhya Anil Harihar, Anant Sidhappa Kurhade
Forensic Science International Synergy
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Letter to the editor: Re-examining the role of deep learning in cyber forensics: Practical gaps beyond conceptual frameworks

Shital Yashwant Waware, Sandhya Anil Harihar, Anant Sidhappa Kurhade
article en

Abstract

This letter investigates the applicability of deep learning-based techniques proposed for cyber forensics by exploring its practical limitations. Although current models depict disciplined investigation process stages, there are a lot of issues that still exist in real-world utilization. Primary concerns are data quality and bias, lack of forensic-grade validation of the method, low explainability of model outputs, and risk to evidence integrity when performing automated comparison. The debate also draws attention to the necessity of generalizing existing methodologies from post-incident review to forensic readiness and real-time monitoring. The paper contends that deep learning tools ought to serve as, not substitute for, expert judgment, with appropriate safeguards for transparency, accountability and legal admissibility. Resolving these problems is important as bridging conceptual and physical understanding with dependable forensic process.

Forensic Science International SynergyVol. 12
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre (IN), Father Muller Homoeopathic Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.