Allostatic load in psychiatry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders is complex and involves multiple biological systems. The allostatic load (AL) model offers a framework to capture this multisystem dysregulation by assessing biomarkers that reflect the activity of different physiological systems. This systematic review aimed to summarise current literature on the association between AL and psychiatric disorders. The databases Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to July 2025. A total of twenty-eight studies were included in the systematic review, and sixteen were eligible for meta-analysis. We found that individuals with a psychiatric disorder demonstrated elevated AL compared to healthy controls (HCs). Furthermore, the meta-analyses revealed an overall standardised mean difference of the between-group meta-analysis, which demonstrated higher AL in individuals with schizophrenia and first-episode psychosis (SMD: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.18; <i>p</i> < .0001) compared to HCs. In contrast, no significant difference in AL was observed for individuals with major depressive disorder (SMD: 0.07; 95% CI: -0.23; 0.37; <i>p</i> = 0.67). In conclusion, the AL model may offer a valuable tool for evaluating the impact of chronic stress across various biological systems. This approach can be applied to the early intervention of the core pathophysiology as well as systemic comorbidities that are common among those with psychiatric symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stress
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2026.2635367
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allostatic load in psychiatry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Z. Sarnyai, Riana Marie, Sabine Finlay, Donna Rudd et al.
Stress
Stress Responses and Cortisol
article

Allostatic load in psychiatry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Z. Sarnyai, Riana Marie, Sabine Finlay, Donna Rudd, Brett McDermott, Blazej Misiak, Robert-Paul Juster
article en

Abstract

The pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders is complex and involves multiple biological systems. The allostatic load (AL) model offers a framework to capture this multisystem dysregulation by assessing biomarkers that reflect the activity of different physiological systems. This systematic review aimed to summarise current literature on the association between AL and psychiatric disorders. The databases Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to July 2025. A total of twenty-eight studies were included in the systematic review, and sixteen were eligible for meta-analysis. We found that individuals with a psychiatric disorder demonstrated elevated AL compared to healthy controls (HCs). Furthermore, the meta-analyses revealed an overall standardised mean difference of the between-group meta-analysis, which demonstrated higher AL in individuals with schizophrenia and first-episode psychosis (SMD: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.18; <i>p</i> < .0001) compared to HCs. In contrast, no significant difference in AL was observed for individuals with major depressive disorder (SMD: 0.07; 95% CI: -0.23; 0.37; <i>p</i> = 0.67). In conclusion, the AL model may offer a valuable tool for evaluating the impact of chronic stress across various biological systems. This approach can be applied to the early intervention of the core pathophysiology as well as systemic comorbidities that are common among those with psychiatric symptoms.

StressVol. 29(1)
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU), Centre for Mental Health (GB), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Addiction Research Foundation (US), Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), James Cook University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.