Assessing the durability environmental impact and cost benefits of offsite construction in enhancing housing affordability in Uganda

This study looks at how offsite construction (OSC) can help make housing more affordable in Uganda, which faces a shortage of over 2.4 million housing units. Survey was adopted to gather data from 284 people, including homeowners, architects, engineers, contractors, and policymakers. This helped to understand different views on OSC's durability, environmental performance, and cost-effectiveness. Data were analyzed focusing on key durability indicators like structural integrity, resistance to weather and pests, maintenance needs, and long-term performance. Environmental impact was assessed using indicators such as waste reduction, energy efficiency, resource conservation, and reduced carbon footprint. For costs, material savings, labor efficiency, and shorter construction times were evaluated. Findings show that many view OSC as a strong and reliable method of construction. Structural integrity was rated at 4.10 and weather resistance at 3.95. The environmental benefits are clear, with waste reduction at 4.10 and resource conservation at 4.05, highlighting OSC’s role in promoting sustainable housing. There are also significant cost benefits. Material costs dropped by 18.2%, labor costs by 21.7%, and time-related expenses by 38.5%. This led to an overall 22.5% decrease in construction costs compared to traditional methods. Major barriers to adoption include limited access to quality materials (58.5%), a lack of skilled labor (54.2%), and insufficient regulations (49.3%). The study provides specific evidence that OSC is a practical, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly solution to Uganda’s housing crisis. These findings emphasize the need for policy support, workforce training, and stronger supply chains. By combining strength, environmental efficiency, and economic benefits, OSC offers a new way to provide affordable, sustainable housing and tackle the issues of rapid urban growth in Uganda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02781-1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the durability environmental impact and cost benefits of offsite construction in enhancing housing affordability in Uganda

Nansamba Jackline, Deepa Krishnan, Nnadi Ezekiel
Discover Sustainability
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Assessing the durability environmental impact and cost benefits of offsite construction in enhancing housing affordability in Uganda

Nansamba Jackline, Deepa Krishnan, Nnadi Ezekiel
article en

Abstract

This study looks at how offsite construction (OSC) can help make housing more affordable in Uganda, which faces a shortage of over 2.4 million housing units. Survey was adopted to gather data from 284 people, including homeowners, architects, engineers, contractors, and policymakers. This helped to understand different views on OSC's durability, environmental performance, and cost-effectiveness. Data were analyzed focusing on key durability indicators like structural integrity, resistance to weather and pests, maintenance needs, and long-term performance. Environmental impact was assessed using indicators such as waste reduction, energy efficiency, resource conservation, and reduced carbon footprint. For costs, material savings, labor efficiency, and shorter construction times were evaluated. Findings show that many view OSC as a strong and reliable method of construction. Structural integrity was rated at 4.10 and weather resistance at 3.95. The environmental benefits are clear, with waste reduction at 4.10 and resource conservation at 4.05, highlighting OSC’s role in promoting sustainable housing. There are also significant cost benefits. Material costs dropped by 18.2%, labor costs by 21.7%, and time-related expenses by 38.5%. This led to an overall 22.5% decrease in construction costs compared to traditional methods. Major barriers to adoption include limited access to quality materials (58.5%), a lack of skilled labor (54.2%), and insufficient regulations (49.3%). The study provides specific evidence that OSC is a practical, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly solution to Uganda’s housing crisis. These findings emphasize the need for policy support, workforce training, and stronger supply chains. By combining strength, environmental efficiency, and economic benefits, OSC offers a new way to provide affordable, sustainable housing and tackle the issues of rapid urban growth in Uganda.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 7(1)
Kampala International University (UG), INES-Ruhengeri (RW)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.