Robotic surgery in France: insights from a national administrative database on utilization, access, and efficiency

Robotic-assisted surgery has become an integral component of minimally invasive surgery, yet its nationwide diffusion and real-world impact in France have only recently become measurable following the implementation of mandatory procedural traceability. We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, cross-sectional study. All adult patients undergoing selected urologic, digestive, gynecologic, and thoracic procedures between January 2021 and December 2022 were included. Surgical approaches were classified as robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, or open. Primary outcomes were national volumes, robotic penetration rates, and regional distribution. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and 30- and 90-day readmission rates. A total of 58 232 robotic-assisted procedures were identified, increasing from 27 011 in 2021 to 31,221 in 2022 (+ 15.6%), and accounting for 15.6% of minimally invasive procedures. Urology predominated (61%), followed by digestive (17%), gynecologic (15%), and thoracic surgery (7%). Robotic penetration reached 54.9% in urology but remained below 15% in other specialties. Marked regional disparities were observed, with Île-de-France accounting for over 27% of all robotic procedures, while several regions reported minimal or no activity. Compared with laparoscopic and open surgery, robotic-assisted procedures were associated with shorter length of stay (4.2 vs. 5.7 and 7.9 days, respectively), lower intensive care unit admission rates (6.3% vs. 9.7% and 14.1%), and reduced 30-day readmissions (4.8% vs. 5.6% and 6.9%). Robotic-assisted surgery in France is expanding and associated with improved early postoperative outcomes, but its adoption remains highly uneven, highlighting the need for coordinated national planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03188-w
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic surgery in France: insights from a national administrative database on utilization, access, and efficiency

J-C Couffinhal, A-C Benhamou, A. Delafontaine, P. Leprince et al.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Robotic surgery in France: insights from a national administrative database on utilization, access, and efficiency

J-C Couffinhal, A-C Benhamou, A. Delafontaine, P. Leprince, G. Saiydoun, H. Johanet, G. Micicoï
article en

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has become an integral component of minimally invasive surgery, yet its nationwide diffusion and real-world impact in France have only recently become measurable following the implementation of mandatory procedural traceability. We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, cross-sectional study. All adult patients undergoing selected urologic, digestive, gynecologic, and thoracic procedures between January 2021 and December 2022 were included. Surgical approaches were classified as robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, or open. Primary outcomes were national volumes, robotic penetration rates, and regional distribution. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and 30- and 90-day readmission rates. A total of 58 232 robotic-assisted procedures were identified, increasing from 27 011 in 2021 to 31,221 in 2022 (+ 15.6%), and accounting for 15.6% of minimally invasive procedures. Urology predominated (61%), followed by digestive (17%), gynecologic (15%), and thoracic surgery (7%). Robotic penetration reached 54.9% in urology but remained below 15% in other specialties. Marked regional disparities were observed, with Île-de-France accounting for over 27% of all robotic procedures, while several regions reported minimal or no activity. Compared with laparoscopic and open surgery, robotic-assisted procedures were associated with shorter length of stay (4.2 vs. 5.7 and 7.9 days, respectively), lower intensive care unit admission rates (6.3% vs. 9.7% and 14.1%), and reduced 30-day readmissions (4.8% vs. 5.6% and 6.9%). Robotic-assisted surgery in France is expanding and associated with improved early postoperative outcomes, but its adoption remains highly uneven, highlighting the need for coordinated national planning.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Académie Nationale de Médecine (FR), Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement de Nice (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Hôpital Pasteur (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.