Exposure to built and social environments and momentary well-being: A geographic ecological momentary assessment study in Montreal

Understanding how built and social environments shape momentary well-being is essential for advancing urban health research and planning. This study investigated temporal, social, and environmental predictors of daily well-being using a geographic ecological momentary assessment (GEMA) approach. Seven-day GEMA measures were collected between 2018 and 2021 among 889 residents of Greater Montreal, recruited through the INTERACT and REM studies. Participants (mean age = 41.7 years; age range = 18-80 years; 55.7% women) completed the Short Mood Scale three times daily via the EthicaData smartphone app, yielding over 10,600 prompts linked with GPS data. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to assess the associations between well-being and temporal, social, and environmental exposures. Well-being varied significantly across time and contexts (conditional R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.6). Higher well-being was reported in the afternoon (β = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.03-0.43) and on weekends, particularly Sundays (β = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.74-1.49), whereas evenings were associated with lower well-being (β = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.10). Social interactions, especially with friends (β = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.26-2.67) and family (β = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.42-1.25), were strongly associated with higher well-being. Built environment features, including greenness, proximity to parks, and road density, showed limited associations. Older adults (60-80 years) reported substantially higher well-being than younger (18-40) adults (β = 4.31, 95% CI: 3.44-5.18). An interaction indicated that women reported lower well-being than men when surrounded by others without direct interaction (β = -0.66, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.09). Temporal rhythms, age, and social interactions were central determinants of momentary well-being, while built environment factors played a lesser role. Integrating GEMA approaches provides robust evidence to inform urban planning and public health strategies that promote supportive social and temporal environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110159
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exposure to built and social environments and momentary well-being: A geographic ecological momentary assessment study in Montreal

Martina Kanning, Benoît Thierry, Daniel Fuller, Sadun Khezri et al.
Environment International
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Exposure to built and social environments and momentary well-being: A geographic ecological momentary assessment study in Montreal

Martina Kanning, Benoît Thierry, Daniel Fuller, Sadun Khezri, M. Winters, Yan Kestens, Ahmed El Geneidy
article en

Abstract

Understanding how built and social environments shape momentary well-being is essential for advancing urban health research and planning. This study investigated temporal, social, and environmental predictors of daily well-being using a geographic ecological momentary assessment (GEMA) approach. Seven-day GEMA measures were collected between 2018 and 2021 among 889 residents of Greater Montreal, recruited through the INTERACT and REM studies. Participants (mean age = 41.7 years; age range = 18-80 years; 55.7% women) completed the Short Mood Scale three times daily via the EthicaData smartphone app, yielding over 10,600 prompts linked with GPS data. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to assess the associations between well-being and temporal, social, and environmental exposures. Well-being varied significantly across time and contexts (conditional R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.6). Higher well-being was reported in the afternoon (β = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.03-0.43) and on weekends, particularly Sundays (β = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.74-1.49), whereas evenings were associated with lower well-being (β = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.10). Social interactions, especially with friends (β = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.26-2.67) and family (β = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.42-1.25), were strongly associated with higher well-being. Built environment features, including greenness, proximity to parks, and road density, showed limited associations. Older adults (60-80 years) reported substantially higher well-being than younger (18-40) adults (β = 4.31, 95% CI: 3.44-5.18). An interaction indicated that women reported lower well-being than men when surrounded by others without direct interaction (β = -0.66, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.09). Temporal rhythms, age, and social interactions were central determinants of momentary well-being, while built environment factors played a lesser role. Integrating GEMA approaches provides robust evidence to inform urban planning and public health strategies that promote supportive social and temporal environments.

Environment InternationalVol. 209
Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Konstanz (DE), Saskatchewan Health Authority (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), HTWG Hochschule Konstanz - Technik, Wirtschaft und Gestaltung (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.