Extracting public opinion on typhoon disasters in China: a sina weibo case study of landfalling typhoon Muifa (2022)

This study investigates public opinion dynamics on Sina Weibo during Typhoon Muifa (2022), which made four landfalls in China. Using a dataset of 19,417 microblog posts, we employed Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and correlation statistics to characterize the evolution of public attention and discourse alongside the typhoon's activity. Results identified four dominant discussion topic categories: typhoon impact, weather conditions, meteorological information, and disaster response. Personal accounts predominantly contributed to the first two categories, while official accounts dominated discussions on the latter two. A strong positive correlation emerged between daily total precipitation and the number of microblog counts (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84, q < 0.001), which was particularly pronounced in forecasted landfall provinces Zhejiang, Shanghai, Shandong, and Liaoning (q < 0.05). Negative sentiment was highly correlated with rising precipitation, a trend largely driven by discussions within the typhoon impact topic category. Our findings underscore the potential of social media as a real-time indicator of localized public sentiment during disasters, with official risk narratives playing a key role in shaping attention. This study offers insights that may inform targeted risk communication and emergency management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40736-8
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extracting public opinion on typhoon disasters in China: a sina weibo case study of landfalling typhoon Muifa (2022)

Chunyi Xiang, Chuanhai Qian, Lu Liu, Yongchang Zhu et al.
Scientific Reports
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Extracting public opinion on typhoon disasters in China: a sina weibo case study of landfalling typhoon Muifa (2022)

Chunyi Xiang, Chuanhai Qian, Lu Liu, Yongchang Zhu, Qian Wang, Jing Xu, Yanran Sun
article en

Abstract

This study investigates public opinion dynamics on Sina Weibo during Typhoon Muifa (2022), which made four landfalls in China. Using a dataset of 19,417 microblog posts, we employed Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and correlation statistics to characterize the evolution of public attention and discourse alongside the typhoon's activity. Results identified four dominant discussion topic categories: typhoon impact, weather conditions, meteorological information, and disaster response. Personal accounts predominantly contributed to the first two categories, while official accounts dominated discussions on the latter two. A strong positive correlation emerged between daily total precipitation and the number of microblog counts (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84, q < 0.001), which was particularly pronounced in forecasted landfall provinces Zhejiang, Shanghai, Shandong, and Liaoning (q < 0.05). Negative sentiment was highly correlated with rising precipitation, a trend largely driven by discussions within the typhoon impact topic category. Our findings underscore the potential of social media as a real-time indicator of localized public sentiment during disasters, with official risk narratives playing a key role in shaping attention. This study offers insights that may inform targeted risk communication and emergency management strategies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CN), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN)
China Meteorological Administration
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.