Decoding Emergency Department Dissatisfaction: Factors Associated with Patient Complaints

Introduction: Patient experience has important implications for hospitals and patient care including its ties to reputation, reimbursement, and clinical outcomes. Despite its importance, little is known about how operational factors in the emergency department (ED) impact formal complaints. In this study we aimed to identify encounter-level operational characteristics associated with the risk of formal patient complaints. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched-cohort study of ED encounters between October 2023–December 2024 at three EDs affiliated with a large academic health system. Each complaint case was matched to three non-complaint cases (3:1 matching) based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, acuity score, and chief complaint. We used logistic regression to assess the associations between operational factors and the likelihood of submitting a formal complaint. A Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons with statistical significance set at P < .005. Results: Of 246,983 ED visits, 476 (0.19%) formal complaints were submitted. These were matched with 1,428 non-complaint cases. Baseline characteristics, which included age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary insurance, and chief complaint, did not differ, by design, between groups. Analysis revealed that ED length of stay ≥ 12 hours (odds ratio OR 3.12; 95% CI, 2.34-4.18) and an average of more than one ED visit per month (2.00; 1.45-2.73) were significantly associated with increased odds of filing a complaint. In contrast, any imaging performed during the visit (0.43; 0.35-0.54), hospital admission (0.72; 0.57-0.90), and presenting to the ED during a high-volume time (0.47; 0.33-0.67) were significantly associated with decreased odds of filing a complaint. Conclusion: Length of stay > 12 hours and frequent ED visits were associated with a significantly increased complaint risk. Any form of diagnostic imaging, admission to the hospital, and presenting to the ED during a high-volume period were associated with fewer complaints. These findings offer ED and hospital leadership insights on the patient experience and highlight that improving capacity constraints for all patients can have downstream benefits for those who submit formal complaints.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.48866
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Emergency Department Dissatisfaction: Factors Associated with Patient Complaints

Kwame Tuffuor, Craig Rothenberg, Rohit B. Sangal, Mitchell Blenden et al.
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Decoding Emergency Department Dissatisfaction: Factors Associated with Patient Complaints

Kwame Tuffuor, Craig Rothenberg, Rohit B. Sangal, Mitchell Blenden, Sharon Chekijian, Suresh K. Pavuluri, Vivek Parwani, Wendy W. Sun, Reinier Van Tonder, Eleanor Reid
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patient experience has important implications for hospitals and patient care including its ties to reputation, reimbursement, and clinical outcomes. Despite its importance, little is known about how operational factors in the emergency department (ED) impact formal complaints. In this study we aimed to identify encounter-level operational characteristics associated with the risk of formal patient complaints. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched-cohort study of ED encounters between October 2023–December 2024 at three EDs affiliated with a large academic health system. Each complaint case was matched to three non-complaint cases (3:1 matching) based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, acuity score, and chief complaint. We used logistic regression to assess the associations between operational factors and the likelihood of submitting a formal complaint. A Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons with statistical significance set at P < .005. Results: Of 246,983 ED visits, 476 (0.19%) formal complaints were submitted. These were matched with 1,428 non-complaint cases. Baseline characteristics, which included age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary insurance, and chief complaint, did not differ, by design, between groups. Analysis revealed that ED length of stay ≥ 12 hours (odds ratio OR 3.12; 95% CI, 2.34-4.18) and an average of more than one ED visit per month (2.00; 1.45-2.73) were significantly associated with increased odds of filing a complaint. In contrast, any imaging performed during the visit (0.43; 0.35-0.54), hospital admission (0.72; 0.57-0.90), and presenting to the ED during a high-volume time (0.47; 0.33-0.67) were significantly associated with decreased odds of filing a complaint. Conclusion: Length of stay > 12 hours and frequent ED visits were associated with a significantly increased complaint risk. Any form of diagnostic imaging, admission to the hospital, and presenting to the ED during a high-volume period were associated with fewer complaints. These findings offer ED and hospital leadership insights on the patient experience and highlight that improving capacity constraints for all patients can have downstream benefits for those who submit formal complaints.

Western Journal of Emergency MedicineVol. 0(0)
Yale University, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.