Features influencing diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in the DECIPHERD rare diseases study in Chile

Abstract Background Exome sequencing (ES) has become a key diagnostic tool for rare diseases (RDs). However, most evidence on ES performance comes from high-income countries and patients from European ancestry. In countries such as Chile, limited access to next generation sequencing amplifies health disparities and highlights the need to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from ES. Methods This study presents the second phase of the Chilean DECIPHERD project, in which we performed ES in a new group of patients with RDs presenting with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), and/or suspected inborn errors of immunity. To identify clinical and demographic factors associated with an increased probability of obtaining an informative ES result, we conducted a logistic regression analysis, combining the results of the first and second phases of the project. We also objectively evaluated global ancestry measured using ADMIXTURE, as a potential factor. Results Sixty-seven patients participated in this second phase of DECIPHERD with a median age of 6 years (range: 0–27); 55.2% were female, with an average (± s.d.) proportion of Native American ancestry of 0.615 ± 0.18. Clinically, 52.2% presented with both MCA and NDD, and the rest had other phenotype combinations. An informative result, including pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes consistent with the patient’s phenotype, was identified in 34.3% of the cohort; 61% of these variants had not been previously reported in databases such as ClinVar. By combining the two phases of the study, we reached a total of 167 patients, in whom the presence of NDD and/or MCA significantly increased the probability of achieving an informative ES outcome. In contrast, previous use of gene panel testing was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving an informative result. Ancestry was not associated with diagnostic yield. Conclusions This study demonstrates the utility of ES in achieving a diagnosis in a clinically diverse cohort of Chilean patients with RDs, and characterized features associated with a higher diagnostic yield. These findings may contribute to evidence-based patient prioritization strategies in settings with limited access to NGS resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-78591-2
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Features influencing diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in the DECIPHERD rare diseases study in Chile

Gabriela Moreno Yates, Gonzalo Encina, Boris Rebolledo‐Jaramillo, Fernanda Espinosa et al.
3 links
Scientific Reports
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Features influencing diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in the DECIPHERD rare diseases study in Chile

Gabriela Moreno Yates, Gonzalo Encina, Boris Rebolledo‐Jaramillo, Fernanda Espinosa, Luz Martin, M. Cecilia Poli, Gabriela M. Repetto, María Trinidad Hasbún, Víctor Faúndes, Daniela Böhme, Maria Jesús Zavala
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Exome sequencing (ES) has become a key diagnostic tool for rare diseases (RDs). However, most evidence on ES performance comes from high-income countries and patients from European ancestry. In countries such as Chile, limited access to next generation sequencing amplifies health disparities and highlights the need to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from ES. Methods This study presents the second phase of the Chilean DECIPHERD project, in which we performed ES in a new group of patients with RDs presenting with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), and/or suspected inborn errors of immunity. To identify clinical and demographic factors associated with an increased probability of obtaining an informative ES result, we conducted a logistic regression analysis, combining the results of the first and second phases of the project. We also objectively evaluated global ancestry measured using ADMIXTURE, as a potential factor. Results Sixty-seven patients participated in this second phase of DECIPHERD with a median age of 6 years (range: 0–27); 55.2% were female, with an average (± s.d.) proportion of Native American ancestry of 0.615 ± 0.18. Clinically, 52.2% presented with both MCA and NDD, and the rest had other phenotype combinations. An informative result, including pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes consistent with the patient’s phenotype, was identified in 34.3% of the cohort; 61% of these variants had not been previously reported in databases such as ClinVar. By combining the two phases of the study, we reached a total of 167 patients, in whom the presence of NDD and/or MCA significantly increased the probability of achieving an informative ES outcome. In contrast, previous use of gene panel testing was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving an informative result. Ancestry was not associated with diagnostic yield. Conclusions This study demonstrates the utility of ES in achieving a diagnosis in a clinically diverse cohort of Chilean patients with RDs, and characterized features associated with a higher diagnostic yield. These findings may contribute to evidence-based patient prioritization strategies in settings with limited access to NGS resources.

Scientific Reports
Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Clínica Alemana (CL), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US), Hospital Base (CL), Hospital Roberto del Rio (CL), Hospital Padre Hurtado (CL), University of Iowa Health Care (US), University of Chile (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon