Risk Analysis of Tunnel Construction Projects Using Tunnel Boring Machines: A Hybrid BWM–DEA–PROMETHEE Framework

Underground tunnel construction projects using tunnel boring machines (TBMs) require a holistic risk perspective. Such projects face various risks arising from social, economic, political, workforce, and regulatory aspects during project execution. It is necessary to develop preventive strategies for managing these risks and thereby ensure timely project delivery, cost efficiency, and safety. In this study, we aimed to develop a comprehensive hybrid decision-making framework for analyzing risks in TBM-based tunnel construction projects. The proposed approach integrates the best–worst method (BWM), data envelopment analysis (DEA) model-based risk assessment, and the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE). The BWM was applied to determine the weights of decision criteria with fewer comparisons and improved consistency. Subsequently, the DEA model was then used to compute local risk scores under multiple input and output conditions. Finally, PROMETHEE was employed to analyze the risks based on positive and negative outranking flows. The proposed approach was applied to a realistic metro construction project in Bangkok. The findings indicated that the proposed approach effectively compromised all the decision-making attributes to manage the uncertainties. The proposed methodology can support project managers, stakeholders, engineers, and relevant authorities in identifying high-priority risks and implementing effective mitigation strategies to enhance risk management in tunnel construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11020072
Primary Topic
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Analysis of Tunnel Construction Projects Using Tunnel Boring Machines: A Hybrid BWM–DEA–PROMETHEE Framework

Wasana Chankham, Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit
Infrastructures
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
article

Risk Analysis of Tunnel Construction Projects Using Tunnel Boring Machines: A Hybrid BWM–DEA–PROMETHEE Framework

Wasana Chankham, Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit
article en

Abstract

Underground tunnel construction projects using tunnel boring machines (TBMs) require a holistic risk perspective. Such projects face various risks arising from social, economic, political, workforce, and regulatory aspects during project execution. It is necessary to develop preventive strategies for managing these risks and thereby ensure timely project delivery, cost efficiency, and safety. In this study, we aimed to develop a comprehensive hybrid decision-making framework for analyzing risks in TBM-based tunnel construction projects. The proposed approach integrates the best–worst method (BWM), data envelopment analysis (DEA) model-based risk assessment, and the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE). The BWM was applied to determine the weights of decision criteria with fewer comparisons and improved consistency. Subsequently, the DEA model was then used to compute local risk scores under multiple input and output conditions. Finally, PROMETHEE was employed to analyze the risks based on positive and negative outranking flows. The proposed approach was applied to a realistic metro construction project in Bangkok. The findings indicated that the proposed approach effectively compromised all the decision-making attributes to manage the uncertainties. The proposed methodology can support project managers, stakeholders, engineers, and relevant authorities in identifying high-priority risks and implementing effective mitigation strategies to enhance risk management in tunnel construction.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(2)
Ramkhamhaeng University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.