Who cares about ESG? A review of stakeholder perspectives on sustainability ratings

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review and synthesize sustainability ratings scholarship through a stakeholder lens and propose an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach The approach involves a review of the literature on sustainability ratings and the application of a framework grounded in stakeholder theory to understand our current knowledge of ratings. Findings The review identifies eight stakeholder groups with distinct interests in sustainability ratings and suggests future research directions associated with each group. Research limitations/implications The stakeholder categorizations proposed in the paper help to identify limitations in the current state of research and suggest possible areas for future scholarly attention. Originality/value This paper provides an integrative theoretical contribution by systematically applying stakeholder theory to organize a fragmented research stream. While drawing on established concepts, the framework makes implicit distinctions explicit and identifies concrete gaps that can guide future empirical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Research Review
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-07-2025-0559
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who cares about ESG? A review of stakeholder perspectives on sustainability ratings

Jeffrey A. Kappen, Jeffrey Gauthier
Management Research Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Who cares about ESG? A review of stakeholder perspectives on sustainability ratings

Jeffrey A. Kappen, Jeffrey Gauthier
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review and synthesize sustainability ratings scholarship through a stakeholder lens and propose an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach The approach involves a review of the literature on sustainability ratings and the application of a framework grounded in stakeholder theory to understand our current knowledge of ratings. Findings The review identifies eight stakeholder groups with distinct interests in sustainability ratings and suggests future research directions associated with each group. Research limitations/implications The stakeholder categorizations proposed in the paper help to identify limitations in the current state of research and suggest possible areas for future scholarly attention. Originality/value This paper provides an integrative theoretical contribution by systematically applying stakeholder theory to organize a fragmented research stream. While drawing on established concepts, the framework makes implicit distinctions explicit and identifies concrete gaps that can guide future empirical research.

Management Research ReviewVol. 49(2)
SUNY Plattsburgh (US), Drake University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.