Thermal transmittance of slab on ground floors: A comparison of simplified methods and dynamic modelling, insulation thickness, and edge effect

Calculation of heat loss through slab-on-ground depends on the methods used. This study evaluates the thermal transmittance of slab-on-ground floors using 14 methods, including validated 2D and 3D transient and steady-state simulation tools and 10 simplified 1D calculation approaches, including EN ISO 13370 standard. The analysis considers insulation thicknesses 0–800 mm, four building geometries, and edge configurations to assess existing methods for modern, highly insulated structures. The results reveal that the EN ISO 13370 standard procedure for typical detached and terraced house sizes demonstrated accuracy within ±3%, and for large buildings within ±6%, as validated by steady-state and dynamic simulations. Methods using zone-based approach resulted in relative differences 54% lower to 271% higher in extreme, primarily uninsulated floors. Other one-equation methods showed even larger maximum relative difference variations, especially in uninsulated cases, ranging from 43% lower to 3120% higher across floor sizes and methods. This highlights the importance of representing ground effects properly, especially for uninsulated cases. Models with typical wall-floor junctions showed that neglecting FEM-calculated thermal bridges and relying solely on EN ISO 13370 for main and edge heat loss could omit up to 40% of heat loss in well-insulated 20 × 8 m floors. Significant inaccuracies were observed in uninsulated cases when evaluating the edge heat loss correction factor itself (excluding wall-floor junction effects) against FEM results. Vertical edge insulation cases calculated using the EN ISO 13370 gave lower edge heat loss, while horizontal edge insulation cases gave higher edge heat loss compared to 2D FEM results. A biased scenario is also discussed, where the edge insulation width equals half of the characteristic length, covering the entire floor area in 2D but not in 3D, emphasising the need to appropriately scale horizontal edge insulation length, particularly in small and primarily uninsulated 2D models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Physics
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17442591251414129
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermal transmittance of slab on ground floors: A comparison of simplified methods and dynamic modelling, insulation thickness, and edge effect

Siim Lomp, Jaanus Hallik, Targo Kalamees, Guido Schilf
Journal of Building Physics
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Thermal transmittance of slab on ground floors: A comparison of simplified methods and dynamic modelling, insulation thickness, and edge effect

Siim Lomp, Jaanus Hallik, Targo Kalamees, Guido Schilf
article en

Abstract

Calculation of heat loss through slab-on-ground depends on the methods used. This study evaluates the thermal transmittance of slab-on-ground floors using 14 methods, including validated 2D and 3D transient and steady-state simulation tools and 10 simplified 1D calculation approaches, including EN ISO 13370 standard. The analysis considers insulation thicknesses 0–800 mm, four building geometries, and edge configurations to assess existing methods for modern, highly insulated structures. The results reveal that the EN ISO 13370 standard procedure for typical detached and terraced house sizes demonstrated accuracy within ±3%, and for large buildings within ±6%, as validated by steady-state and dynamic simulations. Methods using zone-based approach resulted in relative differences 54% lower to 271% higher in extreme, primarily uninsulated floors. Other one-equation methods showed even larger maximum relative difference variations, especially in uninsulated cases, ranging from 43% lower to 3120% higher across floor sizes and methods. This highlights the importance of representing ground effects properly, especially for uninsulated cases. Models with typical wall-floor junctions showed that neglecting FEM-calculated thermal bridges and relying solely on EN ISO 13370 for main and edge heat loss could omit up to 40% of heat loss in well-insulated 20 × 8 m floors. Significant inaccuracies were observed in uninsulated cases when evaluating the edge heat loss correction factor itself (excluding wall-floor junction effects) against FEM results. Vertical edge insulation cases calculated using the EN ISO 13370 gave lower edge heat loss, while horizontal edge insulation cases gave higher edge heat loss compared to 2D FEM results. A biased scenario is also discussed, where the edge insulation width equals half of the characteristic length, covering the entire floor area in 2D but not in 3D, emphasising the need to appropriately scale horizontal edge insulation length, particularly in small and primarily uninsulated 2D models.

Journal of Building Physics
Tallinn University of Technology (EE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.