Restorative justice and sexual violence on college and university campuses: scoping review and recommendations for further research

Traditional approaches to adjudicating sexual assault on university campuses are grounded in adversarial frameworks that are arguably narrowly punitive and retraumatizing for survivors. There have been many calls for "restorative justice" (RJ) as a promising alternative. However, RJ in higher education settings remains relatively underexplored, particularly in relation to sexual violence. This scoping review synthesizes existing scholarship on RJ as applied to sexual violence within higher education settings in the United States. A comprehensive search was conducted in July of 2023. Emergent themes of 41included articles were: dissatisfaction with traditional adjudication practices; enthusiasm about possibilities for introducing RJ practices; concerns about practical and theoretical implications of using RJ practices on campuses; recognition of limited existing research; and recommendations/considerations for implementation. This review revealed significant gaps in existing evidence. Future research should examine the effectiveness, institutional uptake, and macro-structural context of RJ practices to address sexual harm on college campuses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sexual Aggression
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2026.2621370
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restorative justice and sexual violence on college and university campuses: scoping review and recommendations for further research

Jennifer Hirsch, Shamus Khan, Ruth Shefner, Caroline Mary Parker et al.
Journal of Sexual Aggression
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Restorative justice and sexual violence on college and university campuses: scoping review and recommendations for further research

Jennifer Hirsch, Shamus Khan, Ruth Shefner, Caroline Mary Parker, Rachel King, Paige Snepp, Jessica Stieger
article en

Abstract

Traditional approaches to adjudicating sexual assault on university campuses are grounded in adversarial frameworks that are arguably narrowly punitive and retraumatizing for survivors. There have been many calls for "restorative justice" (RJ) as a promising alternative. However, RJ in higher education settings remains relatively underexplored, particularly in relation to sexual violence. This scoping review synthesizes existing scholarship on RJ as applied to sexual violence within higher education settings in the United States. A comprehensive search was conducted in July of 2023. Emergent themes of 41included articles were: dissatisfaction with traditional adjudication practices; enthusiasm about possibilities for introducing RJ practices; concerns about practical and theoretical implications of using RJ practices on campuses; recognition of limited existing research; and recommendations/considerations for implementation. This review revealed significant gaps in existing evidence. Future research should examine the effectiveness, institutional uptake, and macro-structural context of RJ practices to address sexual harm on college campuses.

Journal of Sexual Aggression
Thomas Jefferson University (US), Princeton University (US), CareEvolution (United States) (US), University College London (GB), Columbia University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.