When Conventional Methods Fail: Institutional Bricolage as a Research Strategy

This article explores the methodological challenges that face scholars conducting project management research in empirical contexts characterized by apparent institutional voids in which conventional methodological approaches are inadequate. Drawing from our collaborative fieldwork conducted for the Medina Airport public–private partnership in Saudi Arabia, we make three contributions to the project management literature. First, we conceptualize field access in terms of a research strategy entailing processes of bricolaging available resources. Second, we develop strategies to operationalize theoretical concepts in contexts in which there is limited prior research. Third, we propose guidelines for conducting rigorous qualitative research in institutional environments lacking mature and established research cultures. This article provides important methodological and practical insights for project management researchers conducting empirical work in such contexts for generating robust data and knowledge that advance project management research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Management Journal
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728261423128
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Conventional Methods Fail: Institutional Bricolage as a Research Strategy

Mhamed Biygautane, Stewart Clegg, Paula Gerber
Project Management Journal
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

When Conventional Methods Fail: Institutional Bricolage as a Research Strategy

Mhamed Biygautane, Stewart Clegg, Paula Gerber
article en

Abstract

This article explores the methodological challenges that face scholars conducting project management research in empirical contexts characterized by apparent institutional voids in which conventional methodological approaches are inadequate. Drawing from our collaborative fieldwork conducted for the Medina Airport public–private partnership in Saudi Arabia, we make three contributions to the project management literature. First, we conceptualize field access in terms of a research strategy entailing processes of bricolaging available resources. Second, we develop strategies to operationalize theoretical concepts in contexts in which there is limited prior research. Third, we propose guidelines for conducting rigorous qualitative research in institutional environments lacking mature and established research cultures. This article provides important methodological and practical insights for project management researchers conducting empirical work in such contexts for generating robust data and knowledge that advance project management research and practice.

Project Management Journal
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Conventional Methods Fail: Institutional Bricolage as a Research Strategy — Mhamed Biygautane, Stewart Clegg, et al. · Project Management Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS