Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallbladder polyps: a bicentric study

The long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for patients with gallbladder polyps remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of RFA and LC in patients with gallbladder polyps. In this retrospective study, we included 160 patients who underwent treatment for gallbladder polyps at two Chinese medical centres from May 2021 to May 2023, with 79 cases in the RFA group and 81 cases in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group. The lesion disappearance rates of RFA group were 83.5%, 89.9%, 94.9%, 97.5% and 100.0% at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1-year after ablation, respectively. In the RFA group, no statistically significant difference was observed in the diameter of non-target lesions between the preoperative measurements and those taken at any postoperative follow-up (all P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in gallbladder contraction rate and gallbladder wall thickness before and after ablation (P > 0.05). Postoperative ALT and AST levels were significantly higher, while TP levels were lower, in the LC group compared to the RFA group (all P < 0.05). The differences in hospital stay, operative time, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative eating time, and NRS scores on the first postoperative day were also statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The incidence of complications and treatment costs between the two groups did not show statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). Compared with the RFA group, the LC group showed a higher incidence of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, bile reflux gastritis, and malabsorption at 1-year postoperatively (all P < 0.05). Sessile polyps were at higher risk for bile leakage than pedunculated polyps in the RFA group (P = 0.038). In conclusion, ultrasound-guided RFA of gallbladder polyps can effectively inactivate the polyps while preserving the gallbladder, representing a safe, effective, and feasible alternative to LC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40927-3
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallbladder polyps: a bicentric study

Yanwei Chen, Huajiao Zhao, Shuangshuang Zhao, Mengyuan Shang et al.
Scientific Reports
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallbladder polyps: a bicentric study

Yanwei Chen, Huajiao Zhao, Shuangshuang Zhao, Mengyuan Shang, Xudong Wu, Gang Dong, Yun Cai, Zheng Zhang, Baoding Chen
article en

Abstract

The long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for patients with gallbladder polyps remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of RFA and LC in patients with gallbladder polyps. In this retrospective study, we included 160 patients who underwent treatment for gallbladder polyps at two Chinese medical centres from May 2021 to May 2023, with 79 cases in the RFA group and 81 cases in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group. The lesion disappearance rates of RFA group were 83.5%, 89.9%, 94.9%, 97.5% and 100.0% at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1-year after ablation, respectively. In the RFA group, no statistically significant difference was observed in the diameter of non-target lesions between the preoperative measurements and those taken at any postoperative follow-up (all P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in gallbladder contraction rate and gallbladder wall thickness before and after ablation (P > 0.05). Postoperative ALT and AST levels were significantly higher, while TP levels were lower, in the LC group compared to the RFA group (all P < 0.05). The differences in hospital stay, operative time, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative eating time, and NRS scores on the first postoperative day were also statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The incidence of complications and treatment costs between the two groups did not show statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). Compared with the RFA group, the LC group showed a higher incidence of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, bile reflux gastritis, and malabsorption at 1-year postoperatively (all P < 0.05). Sessile polyps were at higher risk for bile leakage than pedunculated polyps in the RFA group (P = 0.038). In conclusion, ultrasound-guided RFA of gallbladder polyps can effectively inactivate the polyps while preserving the gallbladder, representing a safe, effective, and feasible alternative to LC.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Jiangsu University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
National Science Foundation, Jiangsu University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.