Experts’ Perceptions on Barriers and Incentives to Green Hydrogen Adoption: Evidence from Europe and Beyond

Green hydrogen receives attention across academia, governments, and practitioners as a technical solution to decarbonize economic sectors, yet its large-scale deployment faces significant barriers and depends on effective policy incentives. There is little research examining how actors perceive barriers and incentives. Understanding such perspectives is key to designing impactful policies. This study investigates actors’ perceptions of barriers and incentives and how these vary across organizational characteristics, gender, managerial role, and Romanian market exposure. An online survey conducted in 2025 collected responses from diverse stakeholders across the European hydrogen value chain (N = 236). Responses were analyzed using Chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis tests, as well as Pearson’s correlations. Results show that “high capital costs”, “regulatory uncertainty”, and “lack of infrastructure” are seen as the most critical barriers, while “financial subsidies”, “regulatory mandates”, and “public policies” are the preferred incentives. Statistically significant differences emerge for “public acceptance” and “limited market demand” across organizational roles and types, and for “public–private partnerships” among respondents with Romanian market contact. By showing that barriers and incentives are not only structural, but also shaped by individual and organizational characteristics, this study highlights conceptually that green hydrogen policies must consider diverse business perspectives to be successful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Societies
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16020073
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experts’ Perceptions on Barriers and Incentives to Green Hydrogen Adoption: Evidence from Europe and Beyond

Elena Ocenic, Mihai Sandu
Societies
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
article

Experts’ Perceptions on Barriers and Incentives to Green Hydrogen Adoption: Evidence from Europe and Beyond

Elena Ocenic, Mihai Sandu
article en

Abstract

Green hydrogen receives attention across academia, governments, and practitioners as a technical solution to decarbonize economic sectors, yet its large-scale deployment faces significant barriers and depends on effective policy incentives. There is little research examining how actors perceive barriers and incentives. Understanding such perspectives is key to designing impactful policies. This study investigates actors’ perceptions of barriers and incentives and how these vary across organizational characteristics, gender, managerial role, and Romanian market exposure. An online survey conducted in 2025 collected responses from diverse stakeholders across the European hydrogen value chain (N = 236). Responses were analyzed using Chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis tests, as well as Pearson’s correlations. Results show that “high capital costs”, “regulatory uncertainty”, and “lack of infrastructure” are seen as the most critical barriers, while “financial subsidies”, “regulatory mandates”, and “public policies” are the preferred incentives. Statistically significant differences emerge for “public acceptance” and “limited market demand” across organizational roles and types, and for “public–private partnerships” among respondents with Romanian market contact. By showing that barriers and incentives are not only structural, but also shaped by individual and organizational characteristics, this study highlights conceptually that green hydrogen policies must consider diverse business perspectives to be successful.

SocietiesVol. 16(2)
Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.