Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Density Using Intraoral Periapical Radiographs: A Retrospective Observational Clinical Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Osseointegration is essential for the long-term success of dental implants, and radiographic assessment may support the evaluation of peri-implant bone healing. This retrospective study evaluated peri-implant radiographic bone density (PIBD) as a potential indicator of osseointegration in patients who underwent successful implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with at least one endosseous dental implant and a minimum of two standardized periapical radiographs-one at placement (T0) and one during follow-up-were included. Digital radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and analyzed with ImageJ<sup>®</sup>. Normalized bone density values were calculated for predefined areas of interest (AOIs). Marginal Bone Level (MBL) changes were also assessed. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction. <b>Results</b>: 88 implants in 64 patients were analyzed (198 radiographs; 1299 AOIs measurements). Normalized bone density showed significant temporal changes in several AOIs, mainly from 3 to 12 months, across coronal/middle/apical regions. PIBD decreased by approximately 8% between T0 and 3 months, followed by a significant increase at one year. MBL values were minimal and well below physiologic thresholds throughout follow-up. No significant correlation was found between MBL and normalized bone density. <b>Conclusions</b>: PIBD assessment may be a reliable, non-invasive tool for monitoring osseointegration during follow-up and supporting clinical decision-making in postoperative controls. The temporal pattern observed confirms three radiographic healing phases after implant placement: an initial decrease in PIBD during early remodeling, a subsequent increase reflecting osseointegration, and a final stabilization phase corresponding to tertiary implant stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14040541
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Density Using Intraoral Periapical Radiographs: A Retrospective Observational Clinical Study

Paolo Boffano, Matteo Brucoli, Stefano Storelli, Viviana Maria Petrantoni et al.
Healthcare
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Density Using Intraoral Periapical Radiographs: A Retrospective Observational Clinical Study

Paolo Boffano, Matteo Brucoli, Stefano Storelli, Viviana Maria Petrantoni, Edoardo Giannini, Saturnino Marco Lupi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Osseointegration is essential for the long-term success of dental implants, and radiographic assessment may support the evaluation of peri-implant bone healing. This retrospective study evaluated peri-implant radiographic bone density (PIBD) as a potential indicator of osseointegration in patients who underwent successful implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with at least one endosseous dental implant and a minimum of two standardized periapical radiographs-one at placement (T0) and one during follow-up-were included. Digital radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and analyzed with ImageJ<sup>®</sup>. Normalized bone density values were calculated for predefined areas of interest (AOIs). Marginal Bone Level (MBL) changes were also assessed. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction. <b>Results</b>: 88 implants in 64 patients were analyzed (198 radiographs; 1299 AOIs measurements). Normalized bone density showed significant temporal changes in several AOIs, mainly from 3 to 12 months, across coronal/middle/apical regions. PIBD decreased by approximately 8% between T0 and 3 months, followed by a significant increase at one year. MBL values were minimal and well below physiologic thresholds throughout follow-up. No significant correlation was found between MBL and normalized bone density. <b>Conclusions</b>: PIBD assessment may be a reliable, non-invasive tool for monitoring osseointegration during follow-up and supporting clinical decision-making in postoperative controls. The temporal pattern observed confirms three radiographic healing phases after implant placement: an initial decrease in PIBD during early remodeling, a subsequent increase reflecting osseointegration, and a final stabilization phase corresponding to tertiary implant stability.

HealthcareVol. 14(4)
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), University of Milan (IT), University of Pavia (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.