Uncovering AI’s hidden risks: an empirical analysis of health-related AI incidents and their ethical implications

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has transformed clinical decision-making, digital therapeutics, and precision medicine, yet this technological revolution raises profound ethical questions about patient safety, transparency, and accountability in medical care. The implications of AI-related adverse events remain critically underexamined, creating a significant gap in our understanding of how these technologies may harm patients and undermine public trust in healthcare systems. This study addresses the ethical implications of AI technologies by systematically analyzing public repositories and databases that document health-related incidents. We identified 15 potential public databases and repositories, with 8 containing 488 health-related AI incidents. After removing duplicates, 295 unique incidents were analyzed, primarily from the US and UK, spanning 2012 to 2025 and affecting diverse health domains, including cardiology, COVID-19, surgery or cancer among others. Incidents were categorized into risk types, including bias, privacy violations, and misinformation, and compared with five established AI risk frameworks. The identified incidents were reflected from the lenses of the Digital Ethics Canvas. Our analysis reveals ethical gaps in current AI systems in healthcare. The apparently low number of reported incidents may suggest underreporting, potentially raising fundamental questions about moral responsibility, professional duty, and the right of patients and society to understand AI-related risks. Our findings highlight the urgent need for a more detailed assessment and surveillance of AI incidents and their impact to enhance surveillance, improve AI safety, and inform evidence-based policymaking in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01012-7
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering AI’s hidden risks: an empirical analysis of health-related AI incidents and their ethical implications

Kerstin Denecke, Enrique Dorronzoro, Octavio Rivera-Romero, Elia Gabarron et al.
AI and Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Uncovering AI’s hidden risks: an empirical analysis of health-related AI incidents and their ethical implications

Kerstin Denecke, Enrique Dorronzoro, Octavio Rivera-Romero, Elia Gabarron, Guillermo Lopez-Campos
article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has transformed clinical decision-making, digital therapeutics, and precision medicine, yet this technological revolution raises profound ethical questions about patient safety, transparency, and accountability in medical care. The implications of AI-related adverse events remain critically underexamined, creating a significant gap in our understanding of how these technologies may harm patients and undermine public trust in healthcare systems. This study addresses the ethical implications of AI technologies by systematically analyzing public repositories and databases that document health-related incidents. We identified 15 potential public databases and repositories, with 8 containing 488 health-related AI incidents. After removing duplicates, 295 unique incidents were analyzed, primarily from the US and UK, spanning 2012 to 2025 and affecting diverse health domains, including cardiology, COVID-19, surgery or cancer among others. Incidents were categorized into risk types, including bias, privacy violations, and misinformation, and compared with five established AI risk frameworks. The identified incidents were reflected from the lenses of the Digital Ethics Canvas. Our analysis reveals ethical gaps in current AI systems in healthcare. The apparently low number of reported incidents may suggest underreporting, potentially raising fundamental questions about moral responsibility, professional duty, and the right of patients and society to understand AI-related risks. Our findings highlight the urgent need for a more detailed assessment and surveillance of AI incidents and their impact to enhance surveillance, improve AI safety, and inform evidence-based policymaking in healthcare.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(2)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.