Assessing Human Emotional Responses to Urban Sound Environments: Evidence from Web Questionnaire and EEG Survey

The dominant sound sources in different urban spaces influence residents’ multidimensional emotional responses, and the interaction of various sound sources across temporal and spatial dimensions forms a complex sound environment. This study aims to develop a comprehensive index to quantify the emotional impacts of dominant sound sources. Through field measurements, this study classified the collected audios into four major categories (natural, social, construction, traffic) and 15 subcategories, with each sound source characterized by SPL and primary frequency. A total of 1266 questionnaires were collected from 209 participants through a web-based survey for the subjective experiment, while EEG data were obtained from 35 participants in the objective experiment. Next, by integrating acoustic indicators, subjective questionnaire responses, and objective EEG data, this study constructs the CK index using principal component analysis. CK provides a single, interpretable score of emotional impact, where lower values indicate greater calm. Results show that natural sounds consistently outperformed the other three sound types, showing the highest comfort (3.54) and pleasure (3.40) ratings on a five-point Likert scale, as well as the strongest physiological response with a parietal alpha power of 18.44 μV2/Hz. The calculated CK values for natural, social, construction, and traffic sounds were 8.73, 9.91, 10.20, and 10.29, respectively. This study contributes to quantifying the emotional impacts of urban sounds and refining noise mitigation priorities using the CK index.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16040874
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Human Emotional Responses to Urban Sound Environments: Evidence from Web Questionnaire and EEG Survey

Qing Wu, Wei Liao, Lin Liu, Weishi Li et al.
Buildings
Noise Effects and Management
article

Assessing Human Emotional Responses to Urban Sound Environments: Evidence from Web Questionnaire and EEG Survey

Qing Wu, Wei Liao, Lin Liu, Weishi Li, Neng Zhao
article en

Abstract

The dominant sound sources in different urban spaces influence residents’ multidimensional emotional responses, and the interaction of various sound sources across temporal and spatial dimensions forms a complex sound environment. This study aims to develop a comprehensive index to quantify the emotional impacts of dominant sound sources. Through field measurements, this study classified the collected audios into four major categories (natural, social, construction, traffic) and 15 subcategories, with each sound source characterized by SPL and primary frequency. A total of 1266 questionnaires were collected from 209 participants through a web-based survey for the subjective experiment, while EEG data were obtained from 35 participants in the objective experiment. Next, by integrating acoustic indicators, subjective questionnaire responses, and objective EEG data, this study constructs the CK index using principal component analysis. CK provides a single, interpretable score of emotional impact, where lower values indicate greater calm. Results show that natural sounds consistently outperformed the other three sound types, showing the highest comfort (3.54) and pleasure (3.40) ratings on a five-point Likert scale, as well as the strongest physiological response with a parietal alpha power of 18.44 μV2/Hz. The calculated CK values for natural, social, construction, and traffic sounds were 8.73, 9.91, 10.20, and 10.29, respectively. This study contributes to quantifying the emotional impacts of urban sounds and refining noise mitigation priorities using the CK index.

BuildingsVol. 16(4)
Guangdong University of Technology (CN), Shenyang Jianzhu University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.