Intergenerational Orientation Reconstruction (IOR)

Intergenerational Orientation Reconstruction (IOR) is proposed as a transdisciplinary research field dedicated to reconstructing and modelling human orientation centres across generations under historically structured conditions. This working paper (Field Definition Draft v0.2) establishes IOR as a foundational framework that shifts the focus of memory studies away from narrative preservation and towards decision-state architecture. Rather than treating memory as episodic storage or biographical content, IOR conceptualises memory as a dynamic orientation-forming architecture governing long-run patterns of judgement, ownership, coherence and recoverability. The paper introduces three central moves: 1. Reframing Memory as Orientation Architecture Memory is understood as a generative system shaping directional continuity across time, not merely as a repository of past events. 2. Defining the Orientation Centre Across Generations The core object of study is the dynamic configuration of decision-weighting, ownership allocation, coherence stability and recovery capacity within agents under contextual pressure. 3. Operationalising Reconstruction via the Memory Constructor Protocol (MCP) MCP shifts interview methodology from narrative recall to decision-state extraction, focusing on how individuals determined certainty, assumed responsibility, stabilised direction and recovered after failure. IOR explicitly distinguishes between factual reconstruction and orientation plausibility modelling. It does not claim total historical reconstruction. Instead, it operates under structured evidence constraints, requiring transparent marking of verifiable evidence, cross-validated testimony, reasonable inference and narrative supplementation. Within the broader StateFlow / Tri-Generative Governance Architecture (TGGA), IOR occupies the historical–empirical layer, grounding abstract orientation models in historically situated lives. It is not reducible to StateFlow, but uses dynamic state modelling and drift-based orientation theory as experimental substrates. The long-term objective of IOR is not memorialisation, but the development of a scalable framework for intergenerational orientation continuity in AI-mediated societies. In an era dominated by data infrastructures and algorithmic compression, IOR seeks to ensure that human decision architectures, recovery mechanisms and experiential wisdom remain structurally extractable rather than technologically erased. This document serves as a formal field definition and conceptual anchor for subsequent empirical and methodological publications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18728736
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intergenerational Orientation Reconstruction (IOR)

Sincere Ann Ma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Intergenerational Orientation Reconstruction (IOR)

Sincere Ann Ma
article en

Abstract

Intergenerational Orientation Reconstruction (IOR) is proposed as a transdisciplinary research field dedicated to reconstructing and modelling human orientation centres across generations under historically structured conditions. This working paper (Field Definition Draft v0.2) establishes IOR as a foundational framework that shifts the focus of memory studies away from narrative preservation and towards decision-state architecture. Rather than treating memory as episodic storage or biographical content, IOR conceptualises memory as a dynamic orientation-forming architecture governing long-run patterns of judgement, ownership, coherence and recoverability. The paper introduces three central moves: 1. Reframing Memory as Orientation Architecture Memory is understood as a generative system shaping directional continuity across time, not merely as a repository of past events. 2. Defining the Orientation Centre Across Generations The core object of study is the dynamic configuration of decision-weighting, ownership allocation, coherence stability and recovery capacity within agents under contextual pressure. 3. Operationalising Reconstruction via the Memory Constructor Protocol (MCP) MCP shifts interview methodology from narrative recall to decision-state extraction, focusing on how individuals determined certainty, assumed responsibility, stabilised direction and recovered after failure. IOR explicitly distinguishes between factual reconstruction and orientation plausibility modelling. It does not claim total historical reconstruction. Instead, it operates under structured evidence constraints, requiring transparent marking of verifiable evidence, cross-validated testimony, reasonable inference and narrative supplementation. Within the broader StateFlow / Tri-Generative Governance Architecture (TGGA), IOR occupies the historical–empirical layer, grounding abstract orientation models in historically situated lives. It is not reducible to StateFlow, but uses dynamic state modelling and drift-based orientation theory as experimental substrates. The long-term objective of IOR is not memorialisation, but the development of a scalable framework for intergenerational orientation continuity in AI-mediated societies. In an era dominated by data infrastructures and algorithmic compression, IOR seeks to ensure that human decision architectures, recovery mechanisms and experiential wisdom remain structurally extractable rather than technologically erased. This document serves as a formal field definition and conceptual anchor for subsequent empirical and methodological publications.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.