Energy efficiency of botanical systems for the remediation of indoor CO2

• First quantification of lighting energy needs for plant-based CO 2 drawdown. • Crop plants outperformed ornamentals in CO 2 removal. • Supplementary lighting makes plant systems less efficient than ventilation. • Naturally light botanical biofilters could reduce ventilation energy use. Various indoor plant systems have been proposed to have the capacity to supplement building ventilation, however, the use of artificial lighting and its energy requirements to achieve this has not previously been considered for its contribution to plant-ventilation system energy balances. To test the capacity of plant systems for ventilation system energy reduction, the light energy required per unit of photosynthetic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) drawdown was recorded in sealed chambers for several ornamental and one crop plant under two light levels. All species were capable of CO 2 removal, although one ornamental species demonstrated net CO 2 emission under low light, and the crop species ( Pak choi ) substantially outperformed the ornamental species. Green walls and potted plants performed equally, dependant on the foliar area of the plants. To assess the ventilation energy savings capabilities of plant systems, their CO 2 removal capacities (‘ventilation equivalence’) were compared to the modelled performance of a mechanical ventilation system, with performance metrics based on various building standards. It was found that the mechanical system was far more energy efficient than any plant systems, if supplementary lighting was required by the latter. We conclude that botanical systems may play a role in reducing building ventilation energy use, but only if the plant systems are provided with natural rather than supplementary light. We propose a concept design for the integration of naturally lit, plant-based systems into the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (HVAC) of future buildings for the purposes of reducing the energy requirements of the built environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117212
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy efficiency of botanical systems for the remediation of indoor CO2

Fraser R. Torpy, James Torpy, Peter J. Irga, Ralph Fares
Energy and Buildings
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
article

Energy efficiency of botanical systems for the remediation of indoor CO2

Fraser R. Torpy, James Torpy, Peter J. Irga, Ralph Fares
article en

Abstract

• First quantification of lighting energy needs for plant-based CO 2 drawdown. • Crop plants outperformed ornamentals in CO 2 removal. • Supplementary lighting makes plant systems less efficient than ventilation. • Naturally light botanical biofilters could reduce ventilation energy use. Various indoor plant systems have been proposed to have the capacity to supplement building ventilation, however, the use of artificial lighting and its energy requirements to achieve this has not previously been considered for its contribution to plant-ventilation system energy balances. To test the capacity of plant systems for ventilation system energy reduction, the light energy required per unit of photosynthetic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) drawdown was recorded in sealed chambers for several ornamental and one crop plant under two light levels. All species were capable of CO 2 removal, although one ornamental species demonstrated net CO 2 emission under low light, and the crop species ( Pak choi ) substantially outperformed the ornamental species. Green walls and potted plants performed equally, dependant on the foliar area of the plants. To assess the ventilation energy savings capabilities of plant systems, their CO 2 removal capacities (‘ventilation equivalence’) were compared to the modelled performance of a mechanical ventilation system, with performance metrics based on various building standards. It was found that the mechanical system was far more energy efficient than any plant systems, if supplementary lighting was required by the latter. We conclude that botanical systems may play a role in reducing building ventilation energy use, but only if the plant systems are provided with natural rather than supplementary light. We propose a concept design for the integration of naturally lit, plant-based systems into the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (HVAC) of future buildings for the purposes of reducing the energy requirements of the built environment.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 358
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy efficiency of botanical systems for the remediation of indoor CO2 — Fraser R. Torpy, James Torpy, et al. · Energy and Buildings (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS