Effects of Hook Angle and Length on Flow Dynamics in Hooked-Head Spur Dikes: A Numerical Study
Hooked-head spur dikes are a specialized type of spur dike, where their geometry significantly influences flow diversion, sediment transport, and bank protection. This study establishes a three-dimensional numerical model utilizing the renormalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence closure and the volume of fluid (VOF) method to explore the effects of hook angle (90°, 120°, and 150°) and hook-length ratio (L/D = 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4) on the flow structure surrounding a hooked-head spur dike. The study comprises nine simulation cases, and the distributions of mainstream velocity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are analyzed. The results demonstrate that a hook angle of 120° yields the greatest increase in the mean dimensionless mainstream velocity (V*), corresponding to enhancements of 4.26% and 9.09% relative to the angles of 90° and 150°, respectively. When the hook angle is fixed at 120°, increasing the hook length enhances the mainstream velocity; specifically, at L/D = 1/2, the mean V* increases by 10.58% and 14.64% compared to at L/D = 1/3 and 1/4, respectively. Meanwhile, the TKE in the downstream recirculation zone decreases as either the hook angle or the hook length increases. At a hook angle of 90°, the mean dimensionless TKE (E*) is 8.80% and 10.65% higher than at 120° and 150°, respectively. For a fixed hook angle of 120°, the mean E* at L/D = 1/2 decreases by 3.46% and 9.35% compared to at L/D = 1/3 and 1/4, respectively. In summary, the appropriate selection of hook angle and hook length can effectively guide flow toward the channel center, increase conveyance capacity, and enhance hydraulic performance for river regulation.
Authors
- Yuhao Qian
- Yongxin Lu
- Lin Li
- Congyi Ning
Institutions
- Tarim University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Water
- Published
- 2026-02-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040522
- Primary Topic
- Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps