Domain-Specialized Agent Systems in Enterprise AI: A Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of 26 Production Systems

As enterprise adoption of large language model (LLM)-based agents accelerates, practitioners face a critical gap: no systematic framework exists for characterizing how domain specialization, coordination topology, context persistence, authority boundaries, and escalation protocols interact across production deployments. This paper makes three contributions. First, we propose a five- dimensional taxonomy for domain-specialized agent systems derived from foundational multi- agent systems literature. Second, we apply this taxonomy to a corpus of 26 real-world systems — cspanning open-source frameworks, commercial platforms, and documented production deployments — observed between 2024 and 2026. Third, we derive nine design principles from cross-cutting empirical patterns, including the finding that 96.2% of production systems implement formal escalation protocols, while the single documented system lacking escalation machinery suffered a $3.2M fraud incident. Our analysis reveals that functional specialization (50.0%) and hierarchical coordination (42.3%) dominate current enterprise deployments, that long-horizon context persistence is increasingly standard (53.8%), and that advisory authority levels represent a deliberate governance constraint in high-stakes regulated domains. These findings carry direct implications for practitioners designing enterprise agent systems and for researchers characterizing the emerging production landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18731602
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Domain-Specialized Agent Systems in Enterprise AI: A Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of 26 Production Systems

Sebastian Kirsch
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

Domain-Specialized Agent Systems in Enterprise AI: A Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of 26 Production Systems

Sebastian Kirsch
article en

Abstract

As enterprise adoption of large language model (LLM)-based agents accelerates, practitioners face a critical gap: no systematic framework exists for characterizing how domain specialization, coordination topology, context persistence, authority boundaries, and escalation protocols interact across production deployments. This paper makes three contributions. First, we propose a five- dimensional taxonomy for domain-specialized agent systems derived from foundational multi- agent systems literature. Second, we apply this taxonomy to a corpus of 26 real-world systems — cspanning open-source frameworks, commercial platforms, and documented production deployments — observed between 2024 and 2026. Third, we derive nine design principles from cross-cutting empirical patterns, including the finding that 96.2% of production systems implement formal escalation protocols, while the single documented system lacking escalation machinery suffered a $3.2M fraud incident. Our analysis reveals that functional specialization (50.0%) and hierarchical coordination (42.3%) dominate current enterprise deployments, that long-horizon context persistence is increasingly standard (53.8%), and that advisory authority levels represent a deliberate governance constraint in high-stakes regulated domains. These findings carry direct implications for practitioners designing enterprise agent systems and for researchers characterizing the emerging production landscape.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.