Analytical Performance of Nanobody-Based Immunoassay and Immunosensing Platforms for Bacteria and Toxin Detection: A Systematic Review

<b>Background:</b> bacterial pathogens and their toxins present analytical challenges for rapid and specific detection, contributing to over 600 million cases of illness annually and worsening antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Conventional detection methods are useful but limited. Single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) offer alternative recognition elements with unique biochemical and engineering benefits, enabling the development of nanobody-based immunoassays and biosensing platforms that provide fast, highly selective, and reliable detection of bacterial pathogens and toxins in both food and clinical environments. <b>Objectives:</b> this systematic review assesses the analytical and functional performance of nanobody-based immunoassays and sensing formats for detecting bacteria and toxins across food and clinical samples. <b>Methods:</b> following PRISMA guidelines, major scientific databases were used to gather research, resulting in 32 eligible studies published between 2011 and 2025. <b>Results:</b> data collected included assay platforms, target bacteria and toxins, limit of detection, sensitivity, specificity, matrix recovery, and practicality. Risk of bias was evaluated using an adapted QUADAS-2 framework. The review shows that nanobody-based immunoassays have achieved high performance, thermostability, compatibility with genetic engineering, and versatile assay design. When combined with advanced transduction and signal amplification strategies, these systems contribute to the development of highly sensitive and user-friendly bioanalytical platforms for detecting bacteria and toxins. <b>Conclusions:</b> however, most studies relied on spiked samples and lacked large-scale validation, emphasizing the need for standardized benchmarking and real-world testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibodies
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antib15010015
Primary Topic
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Performance of Nanobody-Based Immunoassay and Immunosensing Platforms for Bacteria and Toxin Detection: A Systematic Review

Nadia Touil, Karim El Bakkouri, Omar Nyabi, Sara Benlhachemi et al.
Antibodies
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
article

Analytical Performance of Nanobody-Based Immunoassay and Immunosensing Platforms for Bacteria and Toxin Detection: A Systematic Review

Nadia Touil, Karim El Bakkouri, Omar Nyabi, Sara Benlhachemi, Lamiae Belayachi, Abdelaziz Benjouad, Jean-Luc Gala, Khalid Ennibi, Aya Jalil
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> bacterial pathogens and their toxins present analytical challenges for rapid and specific detection, contributing to over 600 million cases of illness annually and worsening antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Conventional detection methods are useful but limited. Single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) offer alternative recognition elements with unique biochemical and engineering benefits, enabling the development of nanobody-based immunoassays and biosensing platforms that provide fast, highly selective, and reliable detection of bacterial pathogens and toxins in both food and clinical environments. <b>Objectives:</b> this systematic review assesses the analytical and functional performance of nanobody-based immunoassays and sensing formats for detecting bacteria and toxins across food and clinical samples. <b>Methods:</b> following PRISMA guidelines, major scientific databases were used to gather research, resulting in 32 eligible studies published between 2011 and 2025. <b>Results:</b> data collected included assay platforms, target bacteria and toxins, limit of detection, sensitivity, specificity, matrix recovery, and practicality. Risk of bias was evaluated using an adapted QUADAS-2 framework. The review shows that nanobody-based immunoassays have achieved high performance, thermostability, compatibility with genetic engineering, and versatile assay design. When combined with advanced transduction and signal amplification strategies, these systems contribute to the development of highly sensitive and user-friendly bioanalytical platforms for detecting bacteria and toxins. <b>Conclusions:</b> however, most studies relied on spiked samples and lacked large-scale validation, emphasizing the need for standardized benchmarking and real-world testing.

AntibodiesVol. 15(1)
Mohammed V University (MA), International University of Rabat (MA), Université Mohammed VI des Sciences et de la Santé (MA), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.