AI interactivity and human-technology engagement: psychological mechanisms underlying learners’ intention to use AI tools in language learning contexts

The growing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education has transformed how learners interact with technology. Understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying this interaction is essential for optimizing human-technology engagement. Grounded in models of technology acceptance and human-AI interaction, this study examines how perceived AI interactivity influences learners’ behavioral intention to use AI tools, with perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) as mediators. A total of 740 Chinese university EFL learners completed a validated questionnaire measuring four dimensions of AI interactivity (responsiveness, personalization, learner control, and learning engagement) along with PU, PEOU, and behavioral intention. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with bootstrapping to test direct and indirect pathways. All four dimensions of AI interactivity significantly predicted behavioral intention both directly and indirectly through PU and PEOU. Responsiveness exerted the strongest direct effect, whereas, learning engagement showed the highest indirect influence via PU and PEOU. The final model demonstrated good fit (χ2/df = 2.216, RMSEA = 0.041, CFI = 0.964). The results reveal key psychological pathways through which human-AI interactivity shapes motivation and technology acceptance. AI interactivity plays a central role in shaping human-technology engagement. Immediate feedback and interactive design enhance motivation and perceived competence, thus offering practical implications for psychologically informed AI-based learning systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04229-7
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI interactivity and human-technology engagement: psychological mechanisms underlying learners’ intention to use AI tools in language learning contexts

Tang Shi, Chenming Lyu, Shaopeng Li
BMC Psychology
AI in Service Interactions
article

AI interactivity and human-technology engagement: psychological mechanisms underlying learners’ intention to use AI tools in language learning contexts

Tang Shi, Chenming Lyu, Shaopeng Li
article en

Abstract

The growing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education has transformed how learners interact with technology. Understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying this interaction is essential for optimizing human-technology engagement. Grounded in models of technology acceptance and human-AI interaction, this study examines how perceived AI interactivity influences learners’ behavioral intention to use AI tools, with perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) as mediators. A total of 740 Chinese university EFL learners completed a validated questionnaire measuring four dimensions of AI interactivity (responsiveness, personalization, learner control, and learning engagement) along with PU, PEOU, and behavioral intention. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with bootstrapping to test direct and indirect pathways. All four dimensions of AI interactivity significantly predicted behavioral intention both directly and indirectly through PU and PEOU. Responsiveness exerted the strongest direct effect, whereas, learning engagement showed the highest indirect influence via PU and PEOU. The final model demonstrated good fit (χ2/df = 2.216, RMSEA = 0.041, CFI = 0.964). The results reveal key psychological pathways through which human-AI interactivity shapes motivation and technology acceptance. AI interactivity plays a central role in shaping human-technology engagement. Immediate feedback and interactive design enhance motivation and perceived competence, thus offering practical implications for psychologically informed AI-based learning systems.

BMC Psychology
Shanghai International Studies University (CN), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Ludong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI interactivity and human-technology engagement: psychological mechanisms underlying learners’ intention to use AI tools in language learning contexts — Tang Shi, Chenming Lyu, et al. · BMC Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS