Use of D-dimer to Screen for Cerebral Pathology in ED Patients with Non-traumatic Headache and Normal Neurological Exam

Introduction: Our goal in this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of bedside D-dimer testing for identifying secondary headache due to intracranial pathology among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with non-traumatic headache and no neurological deficits. Methods: We conducted this prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study across six tertiary care EDs in Türkiye. Adult patients presenting with non-traumatic headache and no neurological deficits who underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) based on clinical suspicion for intracranial pathology were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were recent trauma, pregnancy, fever, hematologic conditions, and known intracranial pathology. We measured bedside D-dimer using a D-dimer assay with a predefined threshold of 500 nanograms per milliliter. The primary outcome was secondary headache related to intracranial pathologies as determined on the index CT and additional tests as needed or during one-month follow-up. Results: Of the 3,279 patients screened, 1,522 were included in the final analysis. Secondary headache due to intracranial pathology was identified in 57 patients (3.7%). The most common etiologies were subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 20, 35.1%), ischemic stroke (n = 16, 28.1%), cerebral vein thrombosis (n = 6, 10.5%), and subdural hemorrhage (n=6, 10.5%). Bedside D-dimer demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.5% (95% CI, 70-91%) and specificity of 89.2% (95% CI, 87-91%) for identifying intracranial pathology, with a positive likelihood ratio of 7.6 (95% CI, 6.3-9.2) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.35). Diagnostic accuracy was highest for cerebral venous thrombosis: sensitivity was 100% with a wide CI (95% CI, 54-100%), specificity was 86.8% (95% CI, 85-88%), and positive likelihood ratio was 7.6 (95% CI, 6.7-8.6). For subarachnoid hemorrhage, where sensitivity reached 90% (95% CI, 68-99%), specificity was 87.5% (95% CI, 86-89%), the positive likelihood ratio was 7.2 (95% CI: 5.9–8.8), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.1 (95% CI: 0.03-0.4). Conclusion: Bedside D-dimer testing showed moderate performance as a screening adjunct in ruling out secondary headache due to intracranial causes in ED patients with non-traumatic headache and no neurological findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.48604
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of D-dimer to Screen for Cerebral Pathology in ED Patients with Non-traumatic Headache and Normal Neurological Exam

faruk güngör, ömer akdağ, Cenker Eken, Mustafa serinken
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Use of D-dimer to Screen for Cerebral Pathology in ED Patients with Non-traumatic Headache and Normal Neurological Exam

faruk güngör, ömer akdağ, Cenker Eken, Mustafa serinken
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Our goal in this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of bedside D-dimer testing for identifying secondary headache due to intracranial pathology among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with non-traumatic headache and no neurological deficits. Methods: We conducted this prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study across six tertiary care EDs in Türkiye. Adult patients presenting with non-traumatic headache and no neurological deficits who underwent cranial computed tomography (CT) based on clinical suspicion for intracranial pathology were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were recent trauma, pregnancy, fever, hematologic conditions, and known intracranial pathology. We measured bedside D-dimer using a D-dimer assay with a predefined threshold of 500 nanograms per milliliter. The primary outcome was secondary headache related to intracranial pathologies as determined on the index CT and additional tests as needed or during one-month follow-up. Results: Of the 3,279 patients screened, 1,522 were included in the final analysis. Secondary headache due to intracranial pathology was identified in 57 patients (3.7%). The most common etiologies were subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 20, 35.1%), ischemic stroke (n = 16, 28.1%), cerebral vein thrombosis (n = 6, 10.5%), and subdural hemorrhage (n=6, 10.5%). Bedside D-dimer demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.5% (95% CI, 70-91%) and specificity of 89.2% (95% CI, 87-91%) for identifying intracranial pathology, with a positive likelihood ratio of 7.6 (95% CI, 6.3-9.2) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1-0.35). Diagnostic accuracy was highest for cerebral venous thrombosis: sensitivity was 100% with a wide CI (95% CI, 54-100%), specificity was 86.8% (95% CI, 85-88%), and positive likelihood ratio was 7.6 (95% CI, 6.7-8.6). For subarachnoid hemorrhage, where sensitivity reached 90% (95% CI, 68-99%), specificity was 87.5% (95% CI, 86-89%), the positive likelihood ratio was 7.2 (95% CI: 5.9–8.8), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.1 (95% CI: 0.03-0.4). Conclusion: Bedside D-dimer testing showed moderate performance as a screening adjunct in ruling out secondary headache due to intracranial causes in ED patients with non-traumatic headache and no neurological findings.

Western Journal of Emergency MedicineVol. 27(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.