Mission-Driven UAV Path Selection: Post Hoc Cost Evaluation of Deterministic and Sampling Approaches

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed in hazardous and dynamic environments, where path planning requires balancing competing objectives beyond simple distance minimisation. Classical planners such as Dijkstra, A*, and RRT* generate paths efficiently but often overlook mission-specific trade-offs involving energy use, risk avoidance, and reward maximisation. This work proposes a unified evaluation framework that integrates grid-based (Dijkstra, A*, weighted A*) and sampling-based (RRT, CARRT*) planners within parameterised environments embedding a range of functions into penalty and reward zones. A global cost function, J=αL+βE+γP−δR, is applied post hoc to decouple path generation from mission prioritisation, enabling rapid reassessment under changing objectives such as low-fuel, high-safety, or speed-priority scenarios. Experiments conducted on an Apple M2 CPU, repeated three times per configuration to ensure statistical robustness, demonstrate that CARRT* achieves the lowest mission costs and highest efficiency for fuel- and time-sensitive missions, while deterministic grid-based planners perform better in safety- and reward-oriented contexts in four environments. These findings indicate that optimal UAV path planning depends not only on algorithmic efficiency but also on aligning planner choice with mission priorities. The framework provides a reproducible methodology for benchmarking and deploying mission-aware path planning strategies in research and operational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drones
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10020152
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mission-Driven UAV Path Selection: Post Hoc Cost Evaluation of Deterministic and Sampling Approaches

James R. Kelly, Umair B. Chaudhry
Drones
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Mission-Driven UAV Path Selection: Post Hoc Cost Evaluation of Deterministic and Sampling Approaches

James R. Kelly, Umair B. Chaudhry
article en

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed in hazardous and dynamic environments, where path planning requires balancing competing objectives beyond simple distance minimisation. Classical planners such as Dijkstra, A*, and RRT* generate paths efficiently but often overlook mission-specific trade-offs involving energy use, risk avoidance, and reward maximisation. This work proposes a unified evaluation framework that integrates grid-based (Dijkstra, A*, weighted A*) and sampling-based (RRT, CARRT*) planners within parameterised environments embedding a range of functions into penalty and reward zones. A global cost function, J=αL+βE+γP−δR, is applied post hoc to decouple path generation from mission prioritisation, enabling rapid reassessment under changing objectives such as low-fuel, high-safety, or speed-priority scenarios. Experiments conducted on an Apple M2 CPU, repeated three times per configuration to ensure statistical robustness, demonstrate that CARRT* achieves the lowest mission costs and highest efficiency for fuel- and time-sensitive missions, while deterministic grid-based planners perform better in safety- and reward-oriented contexts in four environments. These findings indicate that optimal UAV path planning depends not only on algorithmic efficiency but also on aligning planner choice with mission priorities. The framework provides a reproducible methodology for benchmarking and deploying mission-aware path planning strategies in research and operational settings.

DronesVol. 10(2)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Northumbria University (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.