Advanced flue gas purification for household heating: Evaluating CuO-based and Pt–Pd-based catalysts under real and simulated operating conditions

• CuO and Pt–Pd catalysts were evaluated under artificial and real biomass flue gas • Real flue gas tests revealed strong effects of fuel type and ageing on catalyst activity • CuO-based catalysts showed competitive CO oxidation at high operating temperatures • Pt–Pd catalyst exhibited superior stability during prolonged wood combustion • Results support catalyst selection for emission control in household biomass heating Biomass combustion offers a renewable and decentralised source of thermal energy; however, it remains a major contributor to local air pollution, particularly carbon monoxide (CO) and organic gaseous compounds (OGC). This study evaluates the performance of a CuO-based monolithic catalysts (CH-03 to 07) and compares it to a commercial Pt–Pd-based reference catalyst (CAT 1) under both artificial flue gas (AFG) and real flue gas (RFG) conditions. Tests included controlled AFG conditions containing CO, OGC and water vapour, as well as RFG conditions during wood briquettes and bioethanol combustion, accounting for thermal cycling and sulphur exposure. Under AFG conditions, CH-04 achieved CO conversion rates close to CAT 1 (64 ± 2.3 % vs. 70 ± 2.2 % at ∼370 °C) and demonstrated hydrothermal stability with reversible performance drops below 10 % in the presence of steam. CH-07 matched CAT 1 in OGC conversion but showed up to 27 % lower CO conversion. During bioethanol combustion experiments, catalyst CH-04 exhibited resilience to sulphur content. However, under wood combustion, CH-04 experienced progressive deactivation (conversion drop from 61 % to 22 %) despite regeneration attempts, while CAT 1 maintained stable conversion (84–95 %). These results support the future potential of CuO-based catalysts as low-cost alternatives in low-sulphur applications, while highlighting the need for further development to enhance durability under harsh operating conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2026.100478
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced flue gas purification for household heating: Evaluating CuO-based and Pt–Pd-based catalysts under real and simulated operating conditions

Milan Dej, Estela D. Vicente, Jirí Ryšavý, Jiří Kremer et al.
Applications in Energy and Combustion Science
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
article

Advanced flue gas purification for household heating: Evaluating CuO-based and Pt–Pd-based catalysts under real and simulated operating conditions

Milan Dej, Estela D. Vicente, Jirí Ryšavý, Jiří Kremer, Maria Smyrnioti, Katarzyna Szramowiat-Sala, Martin Chmelář, Lucie Bartošová, Martin Jakubec, Chih-Yung Wu
article en

Abstract

• CuO and Pt–Pd catalysts were evaluated under artificial and real biomass flue gas • Real flue gas tests revealed strong effects of fuel type and ageing on catalyst activity • CuO-based catalysts showed competitive CO oxidation at high operating temperatures • Pt–Pd catalyst exhibited superior stability during prolonged wood combustion • Results support catalyst selection for emission control in household biomass heating Biomass combustion offers a renewable and decentralised source of thermal energy; however, it remains a major contributor to local air pollution, particularly carbon monoxide (CO) and organic gaseous compounds (OGC). This study evaluates the performance of a CuO-based monolithic catalysts (CH-03 to 07) and compares it to a commercial Pt–Pd-based reference catalyst (CAT 1) under both artificial flue gas (AFG) and real flue gas (RFG) conditions. Tests included controlled AFG conditions containing CO, OGC and water vapour, as well as RFG conditions during wood briquettes and bioethanol combustion, accounting for thermal cycling and sulphur exposure. Under AFG conditions, CH-04 achieved CO conversion rates close to CAT 1 (64 ± 2.3 % vs. 70 ± 2.2 % at ∼370 °C) and demonstrated hydrothermal stability with reversible performance drops below 10 % in the presence of steam. CH-07 matched CAT 1 in OGC conversion but showed up to 27 % lower CO conversion. During bioethanol combustion experiments, catalyst CH-04 exhibited resilience to sulphur content. However, under wood combustion, CH-04 experienced progressive deactivation (conversion drop from 61 % to 22 %) despite regeneration attempts, while CAT 1 maintained stable conversion (84–95 %). These results support the future potential of CuO-based catalysts as low-cost alternatives in low-sulphur applications, while highlighting the need for further development to enhance durability under harsh operating conditions.

Applications in Energy and Combustion ScienceVol. 26
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ), Fakultní nemocnice Bulovka (CZ), University of Aveiro (PT), AGH University of Krakow (PL), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.