Raising the patient’s voice in influenza research and care: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) enable the evaluation of patients’ perspectives in relation to their health and well-being. This paper reviews PRO instruments, regulatory guidelines, and product labels for influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) to recommend strategies for their optimal use in clinical research. We conducted a systematic literature review of publications and electronic records reporting PROs for influenza and influenza-like illness. The systematic search identified 112 items, of which 36 were included in the final analysis (20 clinical research publications; two national guidelines; eight influenza intervention product labels; and six PRO instrument descriptions). We identified influenza-specific PRO instruments developed to assess symptom severity and impact of influenza, or the acceptability and safety of influenza interventions; several of these have been used in clinical research, enabling a better understanding of the impact of influenza and influenza interventions. However, further research on the use of influenza-specific PROs in routine care settings is needed. Based on these findings, we describe opportunities and challenges for PROs and propose recommendations to facilitate wider implementation of PROs in influenza research and patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-12821-w
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Raising the patient’s voice in influenza research and care: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes

José Bartelt-Hofer, Chad Gwaltney, Paloma Muñoz-Aguirre, Elizabeth Meda-Monzón et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Raising the patient’s voice in influenza research and care: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes

José Bartelt-Hofer, Chad Gwaltney, Paloma Muñoz-Aguirre, Elizabeth Meda-Monzón, Barbara Aída Flores-Aldana
article en

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) enable the evaluation of patients’ perspectives in relation to their health and well-being. This paper reviews PRO instruments, regulatory guidelines, and product labels for influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) to recommend strategies for their optimal use in clinical research. We conducted a systematic literature review of publications and electronic records reporting PROs for influenza and influenza-like illness. The systematic search identified 112 items, of which 36 were included in the final analysis (20 clinical research publications; two national guidelines; eight influenza intervention product labels; and six PRO instrument descriptions). We identified influenza-specific PRO instruments developed to assess symptom severity and impact of influenza, or the acceptability and safety of influenza interventions; several of these have been used in clinical research, enabling a better understanding of the impact of influenza and influenza interventions. However, further research on the use of influenza-specific PROs in routine care settings is needed. Based on these findings, we describe opportunities and challenges for PROs and propose recommendations to facilitate wider implementation of PROs in influenza research and patient care.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 26(1)
Sanofi (France) (FR), MSD (Mexico) (MX), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.