Whose House? Revisiting the Referent of αὐτοῦ in Mark 2.15

The referent of αὐτοῦ in Mk 2.15 is grammatically ambiguous and remains a point of scholarly debate. Does Mark say that Jesus attended a banquet in Levi’s house, or that Jesus hosted one in his own home, with Levi and others as his guests? The current status quaestionis is basically undecided and timeworn arguments keep being rehearsed. Accordingly, this article attempts to move the conversation forward by revisiting some previously touched-upon yet underexplored notions of Mark’s presentation. After reviewing prior arguments, it first adopts a social-scientific lens to show that Jesus is portrayed as host—a role that, in context, implies ownership of the house. Thereafter, adopting a narratological approach, the study analyzes Mark’s use of ‘house’ demonstrating that the idea of Jesus having a house aligns with Mark’s broader characterization of Jesus, is supported by several other references to a Capernaum residence, and reflects a pattern according to which house owners are typically named—except in 2.15—thus, implying the house is Jesus’s. Taken together, these observations support the conclusion that according to Mk 2.15 the house was Jesus’s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064x251409331
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose House? Revisiting the Referent of αὐτοῦ in Mark 2.15

Tobias Ålöw
Journal for the Study of the New Testament
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Whose House? Revisiting the Referent of αὐτοῦ in Mark 2.15

Tobias Ålöw
article en

Abstract

The referent of αὐτοῦ in Mk 2.15 is grammatically ambiguous and remains a point of scholarly debate. Does Mark say that Jesus attended a banquet in Levi’s house, or that Jesus hosted one in his own home, with Levi and others as his guests? The current status quaestionis is basically undecided and timeworn arguments keep being rehearsed. Accordingly, this article attempts to move the conversation forward by revisiting some previously touched-upon yet underexplored notions of Mark’s presentation. After reviewing prior arguments, it first adopts a social-scientific lens to show that Jesus is portrayed as host—a role that, in context, implies ownership of the house. Thereafter, adopting a narratological approach, the study analyzes Mark’s use of ‘house’ demonstrating that the idea of Jesus having a house aligns with Mark’s broader characterization of Jesus, is supported by several other references to a Capernaum residence, and reflects a pattern according to which house owners are typically named—except in 2.15—thus, implying the house is Jesus’s. Taken together, these observations support the conclusion that according to Mk 2.15 the house was Jesus’s.

Journal for the Study of the New TestamentVol. 48(3)
University of Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.