A Systematic Review on Human Roles, Solutions, and Methodological Approaches to Address Bias in AI

People play a significant role in designing, developing, and employing artificial intelligence (AI) systems. They can consider contextual information beyond the scope of AI models, thereby influencing system outcomes. At the same time, people’s choices or biases can introduce problems into the systems. This paradoxical scenario, in which people can both introduce and contribute to relieving the inherited machine bias, demands comprehensive and multidisciplinary approaches involving informed human interventions to improve systems’ performances and reduce their biases. Researchers across various communities have investigated multifaceted methods to reduce and mitigate bias in AI systems. Regardless of the method, humans are always involved in the debiasing method in one way or another, emphasizing the importance of human intervention during AI systems development. In this systematic review, we analyzed 100 peer-reviewed publications from various human-computer interaction (HCI) and machine learning (ML) venues. We discuss their research efforts to minimize data bias and algorithmic bias from three angles. First, we present a comprehensive taxonomy of bias mitigation solutions, analyzing the research methodologies and standard benchmarks for evaluating these solutions, highlighting the human researcher’s role in developing and evaluating solutions to address bias. Next, we identify humans’ roles in alleviating biases and specify how, when, and where their involvement occurs within the AI lifecycle. Finally, we summarize the research focus and methodologies across research disciplines. Our review revealed that, while technical solutions are essential, addressing bias requires a broad perspective that integrates human oversight, ethical frameworks, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3793667
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review on Human Roles, Solutions, and Methodological Approaches to Address Bias in AI

Amal Hashky, Eric D. Ragan
ACM Computing Surveys
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Systematic Review on Human Roles, Solutions, and Methodological Approaches to Address Bias in AI

Amal Hashky, Eric D. Ragan
article en

Abstract

People play a significant role in designing, developing, and employing artificial intelligence (AI) systems. They can consider contextual information beyond the scope of AI models, thereby influencing system outcomes. At the same time, people’s choices or biases can introduce problems into the systems. This paradoxical scenario, in which people can both introduce and contribute to relieving the inherited machine bias, demands comprehensive and multidisciplinary approaches involving informed human interventions to improve systems’ performances and reduce their biases. Researchers across various communities have investigated multifaceted methods to reduce and mitigate bias in AI systems. Regardless of the method, humans are always involved in the debiasing method in one way or another, emphasizing the importance of human intervention during AI systems development. In this systematic review, we analyzed 100 peer-reviewed publications from various human-computer interaction (HCI) and machine learning (ML) venues. We discuss their research efforts to minimize data bias and algorithmic bias from three angles. First, we present a comprehensive taxonomy of bias mitigation solutions, analyzing the research methodologies and standard benchmarks for evaluating these solutions, highlighting the human researcher’s role in developing and evaluating solutions to address bias. Next, we identify humans’ roles in alleviating biases and specify how, when, and where their involvement occurs within the AI lifecycle. Finally, we summarize the research focus and methodologies across research disciplines. Our review revealed that, while technical solutions are essential, addressing bias requires a broad perspective that integrates human oversight, ethical frameworks, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

ACM Computing SurveysVol. 58(9)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Systematic Review on Human Roles, Solutions, and Methodological Approaches to Address Bias in AI — Amal Hashky, Eric D. Ragan · ACM Computing Surveys (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS