Is the intentionality of mind wandering associated with the combined dimensions of temporal orientation and emotional valence?

Mind wandering (MW) varies in its functional consequences depending on both its intentionality (intentional vs. unintentional) and the content of thought. While previous studies have examined these dimensions separately, little is known about how combinations of content features—such as temporal orientation and emotional valence—are shaped by intentionality. This study investigated whether intentional and unintentional MW differ in content when temporal orientation (past vs. future) and emotional valence (positive, neutral, negative) are considered in combination. Participants reported the content of their MW episodes, which were categorized accordingly. The results showed that unintentional MW was more frequently associated with neutral or negative past-oriented content, whereas intentional MW was more often linked to positive or negative future-oriented content. These findings suggest that the effects of MW content vary depending on intentionality, particularly when multiple content dimensions are considered together. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the functional heterogeneity of MW by highlighting the interaction between intentionality and thought content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03821-7
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the intentionality of mind wandering associated with the combined dimensions of temporal orientation and emotional valence?

Siqing Guan, Hiroaki Kumano, Toru Takahashi
BMC Psychology
Mind wandering and attention
article

Is the intentionality of mind wandering associated with the combined dimensions of temporal orientation and emotional valence?

Siqing Guan, Hiroaki Kumano, Toru Takahashi
article en

Abstract

Mind wandering (MW) varies in its functional consequences depending on both its intentionality (intentional vs. unintentional) and the content of thought. While previous studies have examined these dimensions separately, little is known about how combinations of content features—such as temporal orientation and emotional valence—are shaped by intentionality. This study investigated whether intentional and unintentional MW differ in content when temporal orientation (past vs. future) and emotional valence (positive, neutral, negative) are considered in combination. Participants reported the content of their MW episodes, which were categorized accordingly. The results showed that unintentional MW was more frequently associated with neutral or negative past-oriented content, whereas intentional MW was more often linked to positive or negative future-oriented content. These findings suggest that the effects of MW content vary depending on intentionality, particularly when multiple content dimensions are considered together. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the functional heterogeneity of MW by highlighting the interaction between intentionality and thought content.

BMC PsychologyVol. 14(1)
Waseda University (JP), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP), Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is the intentionality of mind wandering associated with the combined dimensions of temporal orientation and emotional valence? — Siqing Guan, Hiroaki Kumano, et al. · BMC Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS