Analysis of differences in manual material lifting behavior between healthy weight and underweight females

Manual material lifting is associated with risk factors that can lead to musculoskeletal disorders. Body mass index (BMI) plays a critical role in determining the health status of individuals and the burden on the musculoskeletal system. This study aims to compare the lifting behaviors of underweight and healthy weight female participants through the net reaction moment and g-force effects on the L5/S1 joint. For this purpose, participants are asked to perform two different types of manual material lifting actions: stooping and squatting. Joint movements are analyzed using IMU sensors and a 3D kinematic model and dynamic calculations are performed using the Newton-Euler method. Squatting lifting caused higher peak extension moments at the L5/S1 joint compared to stooping lifting. Underweight participants experienced lower moments during squat lifting than healthy weight participants. While there is no significant difference between subjects with healthy weight and subjects with underweight in the evaluations made with peak net reaction moments, a significant difference is revealed in the comparisons made on g-force, which is an evaluation criterion free of mass. This study revealed the critical role of BMI on manual material lifting biomechanics. Although underweight females have a mechanical advantage when manual material lifting, they may be less maneuverable due to imbalance, increasing their risk of injury, so ergonomic training and individualized lifting strategies should be developed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062261421992
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of differences in manual material lifting behavior between healthy weight and underweight females

Ömer Gündoğdu, Bilal Usanmaz, Mithat Yanikören, Sezcan Yilmaz
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Analysis of differences in manual material lifting behavior between healthy weight and underweight females

Ömer Gündoğdu, Bilal Usanmaz, Mithat Yanikören, Sezcan Yilmaz
article en

Abstract

Manual material lifting is associated with risk factors that can lead to musculoskeletal disorders. Body mass index (BMI) plays a critical role in determining the health status of individuals and the burden on the musculoskeletal system. This study aims to compare the lifting behaviors of underweight and healthy weight female participants through the net reaction moment and g-force effects on the L5/S1 joint. For this purpose, participants are asked to perform two different types of manual material lifting actions: stooping and squatting. Joint movements are analyzed using IMU sensors and a 3D kinematic model and dynamic calculations are performed using the Newton-Euler method. Squatting lifting caused higher peak extension moments at the L5/S1 joint compared to stooping lifting. Underweight participants experienced lower moments during squat lifting than healthy weight participants. While there is no significant difference between subjects with healthy weight and subjects with underweight in the evaluations made with peak net reaction moments, a significant difference is revealed in the comparisons made on g-force, which is an evaluation criterion free of mass. This study revealed the critical role of BMI on manual material lifting biomechanics. Although underweight females have a mechanical advantage when manual material lifting, they may be less maneuverable due to imbalance, increasing their risk of injury, so ergonomic training and individualized lifting strategies should be developed.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR), Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR), Atatürk University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.