Comparison of Scrotal Orchiopexy Versus Traditional Inguinal Orchiopexy for Palpable Undescended and Retractile Testis in Children: Insights from a Greek Surgical Center

<b>Introduction/Purpose</b>: Congenital cryptorchidism and retractile testis represent the most commonly presented abnormalities of the male genitourinary system. Orchiopexy is the surgical treatment for both conditions and can be performed either via the conventional two-incision surgical approach or via a singular scrotal incision. The present study firstly investigated the complications associated with each orchiopexy approach in a single-center pediatric surgical department and secondly compared the surgical outcomes in children with congenital cryptorchidism or retractile testes. <b>Methodology</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted in pediatric patients with either congenital cryptorchidism or retractile testes who underwent orchiopexy from 2015 to 2019. Data collected during the study included diagnosis, surgical technique and both short- and long-term complications. Patient stratification was performed in accordance with the type of orchiopexy and the diagnosis UDT vs. RT and inguinal orchidopexy vs. scrotal orchidopexy. <b>Results</b>: A total of 362 children underwent 443 orchiopexies of which 227 were inguinal and 216 were scrotal. Complications were reported in 16 (3.6%) surgeries and from which 14 (3.16%) were presented in for postoperative complications. Short-term complications were presented in four (0.9%) cases and consisted of wound dehiscence. Long-term complications were recorded in 12 (2.7%) cases, including recurrence in six (1.3%) testes, testicular atrophy in three (0.6%) cases and presentation of hydrocele or inguinal hernia in two (0.4%) and one (0.2%) patient, respectively. Notably, 13 orchidopexies with preoperative diagnosis of congenital cryptorchidism, were linked with complications (<i>p</i> = 0.01), 12 of which underwent with two-incision technique (<i>p</i> = 0.07). <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings of the study suggest that a preoperative diagnosis of congenital cryptorchidism is a possible risk factor for postoperative complications. With regard to the surgical technique performed, the single-incision scrotal orchiopexy appears to be a much safer and more effective approach palpable undescended testes, compared to the two-incision approach. For the high-lying testes, although the single-scrotal technique provides good results, more prospective studies with selected impalpable undescended testes are needed to strengthen the existing literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020360
Primary Topic
Testicular diseases and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Scrotal Orchiopexy Versus Traditional Inguinal Orchiopexy for Palpable Undescended and Retractile Testis in Children: Insights from a Greek Surgical Center

Maria C. Florou, Antonia Syrnioti, Ioannis Spyridakis, Triantafyllia Κoletsa et al.
Life
Testicular diseases and treatments
article

Comparison of Scrotal Orchiopexy Versus Traditional Inguinal Orchiopexy for Palpable Undescended and Retractile Testis in Children: Insights from a Greek Surgical Center

Maria C. Florou, Antonia Syrnioti, Ioannis Spyridakis, Triantafyllia Κoletsa, Georgia Raptou, Sophia Tsokkou, Christos Kaselas
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction/Purpose</b>: Congenital cryptorchidism and retractile testis represent the most commonly presented abnormalities of the male genitourinary system. Orchiopexy is the surgical treatment for both conditions and can be performed either via the conventional two-incision surgical approach or via a singular scrotal incision. The present study firstly investigated the complications associated with each orchiopexy approach in a single-center pediatric surgical department and secondly compared the surgical outcomes in children with congenital cryptorchidism or retractile testes. <b>Methodology</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted in pediatric patients with either congenital cryptorchidism or retractile testes who underwent orchiopexy from 2015 to 2019. Data collected during the study included diagnosis, surgical technique and both short- and long-term complications. Patient stratification was performed in accordance with the type of orchiopexy and the diagnosis UDT vs. RT and inguinal orchidopexy vs. scrotal orchidopexy. <b>Results</b>: A total of 362 children underwent 443 orchiopexies of which 227 were inguinal and 216 were scrotal. Complications were reported in 16 (3.6%) surgeries and from which 14 (3.16%) were presented in for postoperative complications. Short-term complications were presented in four (0.9%) cases and consisted of wound dehiscence. Long-term complications were recorded in 12 (2.7%) cases, including recurrence in six (1.3%) testes, testicular atrophy in three (0.6%) cases and presentation of hydrocele or inguinal hernia in two (0.4%) and one (0.2%) patient, respectively. Notably, 13 orchidopexies with preoperative diagnosis of congenital cryptorchidism, were linked with complications (<i>p</i> = 0.01), 12 of which underwent with two-incision technique (<i>p</i> = 0.07). <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings of the study suggest that a preoperative diagnosis of congenital cryptorchidism is a possible risk factor for postoperative complications. With regard to the surgical technique performed, the single-incision scrotal orchiopexy appears to be a much safer and more effective approach palpable undescended testes, compared to the two-incision approach. For the high-lying testes, although the single-scrotal technique provides good results, more prospective studies with selected impalpable undescended testes are needed to strengthen the existing literature.

LifeVol. 16(2)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Papageorgiou General Hospital (GR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Testicular diseases and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.