Linking process parameters to residual stress and distortion in directed energy deposition repair via machine learning and response surface methodology

• FE-driven ML framework established for optimising multi-layer L-DED filling repair. • Upscaling strategy integrates geometric constraints for consistent fill volume. • MLP model outperforms peers with superior accuracy (R² = 0.98, NRMSE = 2.7%). • RSM identifies moderate energy density as optimal balance for stress & distortion. • Scan speed exerts dominant influence on repair quality indicators. Laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED) filling repair is often compromised by printing defects like cracking induced by excessive thermal residual stresses. Optimising process parameters is challenging, as complex thermal histories make trial-and-error costly and simulations computationally inefficient. To bridge this, a finite element (FE)-driven machine learning (ML) framework was developed to optimise multi-layer multi-track filling repair bulk quality. The methodology ensures consistent fill volume by enforcing nominal single-track dimensions. A thermomechanically validated FE model generated training data via design of experiment (DoE) strategies. Among evaluated algorithms, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieved superior accuracy (R 2 = 0.98, NRMSE = 2.7%) as an efficient surrogate. Integrated response surface methodology (RSM) highlighted a critical trade-off, revealing moderate energy density as the optimal compromise for balancing residual stress and distortion. Furthermore, parameter influence analysis identified scan speed as the dominant control variable, closely followed by laser power and preheat temperature. Ultimately, this framework provides a robust and efficient tool for defining optimal process windows in L-DED filling repair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2026.100370
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking process parameters to residual stress and distortion in directed energy deposition repair via machine learning and response surface methodology

Aijun Huang, Bernard Rolfe, Joachim C.G. Eng, Wenyi Yan et al.
Additive Manufacturing Letters
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Linking process parameters to residual stress and distortion in directed energy deposition repair via machine learning and response surface methodology

Aijun Huang, Bernard Rolfe, Joachim C.G. Eng, Wenyi Yan, Louis N.S. Chiu
article en

Abstract

• FE-driven ML framework established for optimising multi-layer L-DED filling repair. • Upscaling strategy integrates geometric constraints for consistent fill volume. • MLP model outperforms peers with superior accuracy (R² = 0.98, NRMSE = 2.7%). • RSM identifies moderate energy density as optimal balance for stress & distortion. • Scan speed exerts dominant influence on repair quality indicators. Laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED) filling repair is often compromised by printing defects like cracking induced by excessive thermal residual stresses. Optimising process parameters is challenging, as complex thermal histories make trial-and-error costly and simulations computationally inefficient. To bridge this, a finite element (FE)-driven machine learning (ML) framework was developed to optimise multi-layer multi-track filling repair bulk quality. The methodology ensures consistent fill volume by enforcing nominal single-track dimensions. A thermomechanically validated FE model generated training data via design of experiment (DoE) strategies. Among evaluated algorithms, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieved superior accuracy (R 2 = 0.98, NRMSE = 2.7%) as an efficient surrogate. Integrated response surface methodology (RSM) highlighted a critical trade-off, revealing moderate energy density as the optimal compromise for balancing residual stress and distortion. Furthermore, parameter influence analysis identified scan speed as the dominant control variable, closely followed by laser power and preheat temperature. Ultimately, this framework provides a robust and efficient tool for defining optimal process windows in L-DED filling repair.

Additive Manufacturing LettersVol. 17
Deakin University (AU), Monash University (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.