A comparison of the suitability of items generated by 4 large language models for pathology continuing certification
We observed significant differences in the ability of the 4 LLMs evaluated to draft items consistent with the ABPath guidelines based on SME scoring. It is important to assess the various LLMs available to determine which model best meets the needs of the user for the proposed task and not to assume equivalence.
Authors
- Anthony Schlinsog
- Bonnie Woodworth
- Eric F. Glassy
- Ritu Nayar
- Ty McCarthy
- Gary W Procop
- Colette Earnest
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- American Board of Internal Medicine (US)
- American Board of Emergency Medicine (US)
- American College of Physician Executives (US)
- Fundación Ramón Domínguez (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Published
- 2025-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf153
- Primary Topic
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00