Maximal radial distance for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a histopathological-radiological study

There is a lack of a reliable parameter for accurate prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer on MRI. We introduce a new parameter for predicting EPE on MRI: the maximal radial distance (maxRADD). It corresponds to the largest diameter of a prostate cancer focus (PCF) perpendicular to the contact with the prostate pseudocapsule. We compared accuracy and reliability of maxRADD with the previously proposed maximal capsular contact length (maxCCL). In a single-centre study, we retrospectively included all consecutive patients undergoing prostate MRI between October 2018 and December 2020, followed by radical prostatectomy. One uropathologist and four radiologists determined maxRADD and maxCCL for each PCF. Accuracy in predicting EPE was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), with optimal sensitivity/specificity cutoffs determined by the Youden J index using the histopathological findings as the gold standard. Correlations between histopathological and MRI values of maxRADD and maxCCL were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Inter-/intra-reader agreements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). A total of 79 men (mean age ± standard deviation, 65 ± 6 years) were evaluated. Twenty-six (32.9%) patients had prostate cancer with EPE. On histopathology, there was no significant difference in the accuracy of predicting EPE between maxRADD and maxCCL (AUC, 0.92 vs. 0.91, p = 0.28). The optimal cutoffs were ≥ 10.7 mm (sensitivity: 70%; specificity: 90%) for maxRADD and ≥ 12.8 mm (sensitivity: 90%; specificity: 70%) for maxCCL. Pearson correlation showed a strong correlation for maxRADD values determined on MRI with their histopathological counterparts (all r ≥ 0.7) for all readers. On MRI, inter-/intra-reader agreements were good for both parameters but significantly higher for maxRADD than for maxCCL (ICC, 0.87 vs. 0.80, p < 0.001 and 0.90 vs. 0.88, p < 0.001, respectively). MaxRADD permits assessing EPE with good accuracy and shows higher reliability compared with maxCCL. Reliable preoperative prediction of EPE improves treatment planning, potentially reducing positive surgical margins and improving outcomes for patients with prostate cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Imaging
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01011-1
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximal radial distance for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a histopathological-radiological study

Johannes Froehlich, Fabio Ramos Poroes, Jana Di Vincenzo, Harriet C. Thoeny et al.
Cancer Imaging
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Maximal radial distance for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a histopathological-radiological study

Johannes Froehlich, Fabio Ramos Poroes, Jana Di Vincenzo, Harriet C. Thoeny, Curzio Rüegg, Carolin Reischauer, Frédéric Fer, Lucien Widmer, Antoine Nobile, Hugo Najberg, Julian Vidal, Audrey El Kaïm
article en

Abstract

There is a lack of a reliable parameter for accurate prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer on MRI. We introduce a new parameter for predicting EPE on MRI: the maximal radial distance (maxRADD). It corresponds to the largest diameter of a prostate cancer focus (PCF) perpendicular to the contact with the prostate pseudocapsule. We compared accuracy and reliability of maxRADD with the previously proposed maximal capsular contact length (maxCCL). In a single-centre study, we retrospectively included all consecutive patients undergoing prostate MRI between October 2018 and December 2020, followed by radical prostatectomy. One uropathologist and four radiologists determined maxRADD and maxCCL for each PCF. Accuracy in predicting EPE was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), with optimal sensitivity/specificity cutoffs determined by the Youden J index using the histopathological findings as the gold standard. Correlations between histopathological and MRI values of maxRADD and maxCCL were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Inter-/intra-reader agreements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). A total of 79 men (mean age ± standard deviation, 65 ± 6 years) were evaluated. Twenty-six (32.9%) patients had prostate cancer with EPE. On histopathology, there was no significant difference in the accuracy of predicting EPE between maxRADD and maxCCL (AUC, 0.92 vs. 0.91, p = 0.28). The optimal cutoffs were ≥ 10.7 mm (sensitivity: 70%; specificity: 90%) for maxRADD and ≥ 12.8 mm (sensitivity: 90%; specificity: 70%) for maxCCL. Pearson correlation showed a strong correlation for maxRADD values determined on MRI with their histopathological counterparts (all r ≥ 0.7) for all readers. On MRI, inter-/intra-reader agreements were good for both parameters but significantly higher for maxRADD than for maxCCL (ICC, 0.87 vs. 0.80, p < 0.001 and 0.90 vs. 0.88, p < 0.001, respectively). MaxRADD permits assessing EPE with good accuracy and shows higher reliability compared with maxCCL. Reliable preoperative prediction of EPE improves treatment planning, potentially reducing positive surgical margins and improving outcomes for patients with prostate cancer.

Cancer ImagingVol. 26(1)
University of Bern (CH), University of Fribourg (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Fribourg Development Agency (CH), Institut de Myologie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.