Psychological Interventions for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine condition affecting 8–13% of reproductive-aged women globally. Psychological features of PCOS are often overlooked despite their association with mental health complications. This systematic review synthesises existing evidence of psychological interventions for women with PCOS. Database searches returned 4982 articles, of which 20 papers were eligible; 12 studies were meta-analysed. Compared to control, psychological interventions had statistically beneficial effects on change from baseline values for depression, PCOS-specific quality of life, general health, and body image. Significant improvements were found in all PCOS Questionnaire (PCOSQ) domains except acne, yet the importance of these differences in clinical practice was indeterminable. Despite statistical effects, the quality of evidence was judged as low/very-low due to between study heterogeneity, risk of bias, and imprecision in effect estimates. Future studies should focus on rigorously designed, well-reported trials, in order to address the uncertainty around the effectiveness of psychological interventions. The protocol of this systematic review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023472417).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology International
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint8010015
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Interventions for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials

Claire Adshead, Lukasz Lagojda, Harpal Randeva, Sophie Williams et al.
Psychology International
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Psychological Interventions for Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials

Claire Adshead, Lukasz Lagojda, Harpal Randeva, Sophie Williams, David Sheffield, Dean Fido, Ioannis Kyrou, Chris Kite
article en

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine condition affecting 8–13% of reproductive-aged women globally. Psychological features of PCOS are often overlooked despite their association with mental health complications. This systematic review synthesises existing evidence of psychological interventions for women with PCOS. Database searches returned 4982 articles, of which 20 papers were eligible; 12 studies were meta-analysed. Compared to control, psychological interventions had statistically beneficial effects on change from baseline values for depression, PCOS-specific quality of life, general health, and body image. Significant improvements were found in all PCOS Questionnaire (PCOSQ) domains except acne, yet the importance of these differences in clinical practice was indeterminable. Despite statistical effects, the quality of evidence was judged as low/very-low due to between study heterogeneity, risk of bias, and imprecision in effect estimates. Future studies should focus on rigorously designed, well-reported trials, in order to address the uncertainty around the effectiveness of psychological interventions. The protocol of this systematic review was prospectively registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023472417).

Psychology InternationalVol. 8(1)
University of Wolverhampton (GB), Aston University (GB), University of Derby (GB), University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Coventry University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
University of Derby, University of Wolverhampton, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.