Lifecycle Assessment of an Aluminium Crash Management System: Manufacturing Impact with Comparison between Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Recycling Scenarios

This study evaluates the environmental impact and energy demand associated with manufacturing one unit of an automotive crash management system (CMS) using life cycle assessment (LCA), based on detailed process data from industrial operations in Norway and Sweden. To explore the circularity of aluminium within the automotive industry, this study introduces a comparative analysis between open-loop and closed-loop recycling scenarios, quantifying their respective global warming potential (GWP), energy demand, and toxicity impacts. By modeling a realistic open-loop scenario and a hypothetical yet technically feasible closed-loop system, this research aims to provide new insights into the role of recycling strategies in enhancing material circularity and reducing environmental impact, an aspect that remains underexplored in current LCA literature on aluminium automotive components. For LCA, cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-cradle system boundaries were employed for the manufacturing and recycling scenarios, respectively. The comparison of the recycling pathways shows that closed-loop recycling significantly reduces environmental burden across different midpoint and endpoint environmental indicators. Similarly, closed-loop recycling results in lower energy demand when compared with open-loop recycling. Sensitivity analysis reveals that sourcing primary aluminium from China instead of Norway nearly triples the GWP due to coal-based electricity and extended shipping distances. Results of the Monte Carlo simulation indicate higher uncertainty of closed-loop recycling due to change in recycling process loss percentage. Overall, this research highlights the environmental advantages of closed-loop recycling and encourages future work on advanced recycling technologies, regional sourcing impacts, and strategies that support long-term sustainability and the circular economy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Circular Economy
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42824-026-00222-y
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lifecycle Assessment of an Aluminium Crash Management System: Manufacturing Impact with Comparison between Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Recycling Scenarios

Ragnar Holthe, Geir Ringen, Khondaker Moin Dastgeer, Md Ali Akram
Materials Circular Economy
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Lifecycle Assessment of an Aluminium Crash Management System: Manufacturing Impact with Comparison between Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Recycling Scenarios

Ragnar Holthe, Geir Ringen, Khondaker Moin Dastgeer, Md Ali Akram
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental impact and energy demand associated with manufacturing one unit of an automotive crash management system (CMS) using life cycle assessment (LCA), based on detailed process data from industrial operations in Norway and Sweden. To explore the circularity of aluminium within the automotive industry, this study introduces a comparative analysis between open-loop and closed-loop recycling scenarios, quantifying their respective global warming potential (GWP), energy demand, and toxicity impacts. By modeling a realistic open-loop scenario and a hypothetical yet technically feasible closed-loop system, this research aims to provide new insights into the role of recycling strategies in enhancing material circularity and reducing environmental impact, an aspect that remains underexplored in current LCA literature on aluminium automotive components. For LCA, cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-cradle system boundaries were employed for the manufacturing and recycling scenarios, respectively. The comparison of the recycling pathways shows that closed-loop recycling significantly reduces environmental burden across different midpoint and endpoint environmental indicators. Similarly, closed-loop recycling results in lower energy demand when compared with open-loop recycling. Sensitivity analysis reveals that sourcing primary aluminium from China instead of Norway nearly triples the GWP due to coal-based electricity and extended shipping distances. Results of the Monte Carlo simulation indicate higher uncertainty of closed-loop recycling due to change in recycling process loss percentage. Overall, this research highlights the environmental advantages of closed-loop recycling and encourages future work on advanced recycling technologies, regional sourcing impacts, and strategies that support long-term sustainability and the circular economy development.

Materials Circular EconomyVol. 8(1)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Norges Forskningsråd, St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.