Clinical and biochemical evaluation of children with short stature in the primary care setting: a systematic review

Short stature is a frequent reason for pediatric referral, yet clear diagnostic criteria remain elusive. Variability in clinical definitions, reference growth charts, and laboratory screening tests complicates the evaluation of affected children. This systematic review aimed to analyze the diagnostic approaches used in clinical and biochemical assessments of short stature in children in the primary care setting. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251002215). Two independent literature searches were performed to address two domains: clinical and biochemical assessment. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and risk of bias was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools. All procedures were conducted by independent reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus or through a third reviewer. A total of 424 studies were included, 35 in the clinical and 7 in the biochemical domain. Definitions of short stature considered in the studies varied considerably: 28 studies used a threshold of < 2 standard deviation score, while 19 applied percentile-based cut-offs (mostly the 3rd percentile); 8 studies considered both definitions, 3 studies do not report any definition. Growth velocity and target height were rarely used, despite their diagnostic value. Local growth charts were employed when available; otherwise, WHO and CDC references were most used. Laboratory assessments also varied greatly, with complete blood count and urine/stool analyses commonly performed, while thyroid function and celiac disease screening were inconsistently applied. There is substantial heterogeneity in the clinical and biochemical evaluation of children with short stature across studies. This reflects the absence of universally accepted diagnostic criteria and standardized screening protocols. These findings emphasize the need for internationally accepted, evidence-based guidelines to improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical management of children with short stature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-026-02215-8
Primary Topic
Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and biochemical evaluation of children with short stature in the primary care setting: a systematic review

E. Verduci, Gaetano Caforio, Claudio Lo Giudice, Vita Antonella Di Stefano et al.
˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics
Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
article

Clinical and biochemical evaluation of children with short stature in the primary care setting: a systematic review

E. Verduci, Gaetano Caforio, Claudio Lo Giudice, Vita Antonella Di Stefano, Rino Agostiniani, Simone Rugolotto, Liliana Guadagni, C. Pecoraro, Sara Sollai, C. Mameli, Annamaria Staiano, Elena Bozzola, Luigi Greco, Giuseppe Banderali
article en

Abstract

Short stature is a frequent reason for pediatric referral, yet clear diagnostic criteria remain elusive. Variability in clinical definitions, reference growth charts, and laboratory screening tests complicates the evaluation of affected children. This systematic review aimed to analyze the diagnostic approaches used in clinical and biochemical assessments of short stature in children in the primary care setting. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251002215). Two independent literature searches were performed to address two domains: clinical and biochemical assessment. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and risk of bias was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools. All procedures were conducted by independent reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus or through a third reviewer. A total of 424 studies were included, 35 in the clinical and 7 in the biochemical domain. Definitions of short stature considered in the studies varied considerably: 28 studies used a threshold of < 2 standard deviation score, while 19 applied percentile-based cut-offs (mostly the 3rd percentile); 8 studies considered both definitions, 3 studies do not report any definition. Growth velocity and target height were rarely used, despite their diagnostic value. Local growth charts were employed when available; otherwise, WHO and CDC references were most used. Laboratory assessments also varied greatly, with complete blood count and urine/stool analyses commonly performed, while thyroid function and celiac disease screening were inconsistently applied. There is substantial heterogeneity in the clinical and biochemical evaluation of children with short stature across studies. This reflects the absence of universally accepted diagnostic criteria and standardized screening protocols. These findings emphasize the need for internationally accepted, evidence-based guidelines to improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical management of children with short stature.

˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatricsVol. 52(1)
AOL (United States) (US), University of Milan (IT), University of Perugia (IT), Ospedale del Ceppo (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT), Santobono Children's Hospital (IT), Ospedale Cannizzaro (IT), Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Rovigo (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.