Photobiomodulation in orthodontics: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-regression and evidence map

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been studied as a potential addition to orthodontic treatment; however, concerns have been raised about inconsistent results. This overview summarizes systematic reviews (SRs) evaluating the effectiveness of PBM in orthodontic procedures. We systematically searched eight databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Google Scholar, VHL). Methodological quality was independently assessed by three reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Citation matrix analysis was performed to measure overlap among primary studies. Data on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) were reanalyzed using meta-regression models (alpha = 5%). Evidence certainty was graded with GRADE. This overview included 40 SRs with 134 primary studies (n = 4730 participants). Most reviews were rated as critically low in quality. For OTM, meta-regression of only low-bias primary studies indicated that PBM accelerates tooth movement by roughly 1 mm over 3 months (Standardized Paired Difference = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.32-1.67; p = 0.004). PBM seems to reduce pain after separator placement, although with limited clinical significance. It may also enhance miniscrew stability, but this is based on very low-certainty evidence. Other outcomes-such as periodontal health, orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption, and rapid maxillary expansion-show no difference between PBM and control groups. In conclusion, current evidence does not support the routine clinical use of PBM in orthodontics. Future studies should focus on improving methodological quality before considering PBM as an evidence-based adjunct therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Odontology
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01346-y
Primary Topic
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Photobiomodulation in orthodontics: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-regression and evidence map

Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto, Daniela Silva Barroso de Oliveira, Fábio Lourenço Romano, Alissa Tamara Silva et al.
Odontology
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
article

Photobiomodulation in orthodontics: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-regression and evidence map

Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto, Daniela Silva Barroso de Oliveira, Fábio Lourenço Romano, Alissa Tamara Silva, Maria Bernadete Sasso Stuani, Gustavo Lopes Puls, Luiz Maurício Nogueira Nunes, Caio Luiz Bitencourt Reis, Leonardo Santos Antunes, Gustavo Henrique Marçal Reis, Livia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Erika Calvano Küchler
article en

Abstract

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been studied as a potential addition to orthodontic treatment; however, concerns have been raised about inconsistent results. This overview summarizes systematic reviews (SRs) evaluating the effectiveness of PBM in orthodontic procedures. We systematically searched eight databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Google Scholar, VHL). Methodological quality was independently assessed by three reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Citation matrix analysis was performed to measure overlap among primary studies. Data on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) were reanalyzed using meta-regression models (alpha = 5%). Evidence certainty was graded with GRADE. This overview included 40 SRs with 134 primary studies (n = 4730 participants). Most reviews were rated as critically low in quality. For OTM, meta-regression of only low-bias primary studies indicated that PBM accelerates tooth movement by roughly 1 mm over 3 months (Standardized Paired Difference = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.32-1.67; p = 0.004). PBM seems to reduce pain after separator placement, although with limited clinical significance. It may also enhance miniscrew stability, but this is based on very low-certainty evidence. Other outcomes-such as periodontal health, orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption, and rapid maxillary expansion-show no difference between PBM and control groups. In conclusion, current evidence does not support the routine clinical use of PBM in orthodontics. Future studies should focus on improving methodological quality before considering PBM as an evidence-based adjunct therapy.

Odontology
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de Alfenas (BR), University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.