A minimal recurrent neural network models the robustness of interleaved practice on motor sequence learning

Effective motor skill learning depends critically on the structure of practice, not solely on practice volume. This study explores the differential learning outcomes when multiple procedural skills are acquired simultaneously through interleaved practice (IP) versus repetitive practice (RP) structures. In humans, IP yields superior long-term retention compared to RP, which often leads to significant forgetting. To explore the computational basis of how distinct practice structures impact motor sequence learning, we implemented a minimal recurrent network-the Elman network-to perform a sequential motor task. The network was trained on sequences presented in either RP or IP order. While RP led to faster error reduction during training, IP produced both superior trained set performance and better generalization to novel sequences. These findings demonstrate that the benefits of IP emerge from the interaction between input variability and basic temporal recurrence alone, without requiring complex biological plasticity mechanisms or specialized contextual processes. Our results suggest a shared computational principle linking human motor learning with catastrophic forgetting in artificial neural networks: variability across practice contexts forces the formation of more robust and generalizable internal representations. This work offers a parsimonious account of IP benefits and informs both theoretical models of learning and strategies for optimizing motor rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40162-w
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A minimal recurrent neural network models the robustness of interleaved practice on motor sequence learning

Hakjoo Kim, Taewon Kim
Scientific Reports
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

A minimal recurrent neural network models the robustness of interleaved practice on motor sequence learning

Hakjoo Kim, Taewon Kim
article en

Abstract

Effective motor skill learning depends critically on the structure of practice, not solely on practice volume. This study explores the differential learning outcomes when multiple procedural skills are acquired simultaneously through interleaved practice (IP) versus repetitive practice (RP) structures. In humans, IP yields superior long-term retention compared to RP, which often leads to significant forgetting. To explore the computational basis of how distinct practice structures impact motor sequence learning, we implemented a minimal recurrent network-the Elman network-to perform a sequential motor task. The network was trained on sequences presented in either RP or IP order. While RP led to faster error reduction during training, IP produced both superior trained set performance and better generalization to novel sequences. These findings demonstrate that the benefits of IP emerge from the interaction between input variability and basic temporal recurrence alone, without requiring complex biological plasticity mechanisms or specialized contextual processes. Our results suggest a shared computational principle linking human motor learning with catastrophic forgetting in artificial neural networks: variability across practice contexts forces the formation of more robust and generalizable internal representations. This work offers a parsimonious account of IP benefits and informs both theoretical models of learning and strategies for optimizing motor rehabilitation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Harvard University (US), McLean Hospital (US), Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.