Developing a measurement instrument for physical activity-related health literacy (PA-HL): results from an eDelphi and cognitive interviews

Abstract Aim Using the health literacy (HL) framework proposed by Sørensen et al. (BMC Public Health 12:80, 2012), this study aimed to develop a tool for measuring information processing competence focused on physical activity (PA). This paper presents results from an approach using the online Delphi (eDelphi) method along with cognitive interviews for the development of a comprehensive physical activity-related HL measurement instrument (PA-HL). Subject and methods PA is a major determinant in preventing noncommunicable diseases and promoting health. Access to and appropriate use of evidence-based PA information is important for making informed decisions favoring PA, particularly in cases of an overabundance of information. Here, a two-stage development process was applied: (1) A three-round eDelphi strategy was employed with HL and PA experts, where items were rated according to relevance and comprehensibility. Consensus was operationalized as an item content validity index; the second round incorporated an online group workshop. (2) Cognitive interviews were conducted with adult participants, utilizing think-aloud and probing techniques. The item pool was analyzed utilizing a questionnaire appraisal coding scheme. Results The preliminary measurement instrument consisted of 60 items. After revision through both stages, it was reduced to 33 items. Most changes addressed undefined terms and overly complex questions. Cognitive interviews suggested the addition of five items and clearly distinguishing between “apply” and “decide” competencies to ensure conceptual clarity. Conclusion The eDelphi study confirmed high content validity, while cognitive interviews demonstrated that most items were well understood but required linguistic simplification and shortening of lengthy or complex items. The item pool strongly focused on information processing competencies which involve decision-making, rather than behavior itself. Future research will psychometrically evaluate the PA-HL measurement instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-026-02683-6
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a measurement instrument for physical activity-related health literacy (PA-HL): results from an eDelphi and cognitive interviews

Elena Cramer, Thomas Hering, Kevin Dadaczynski
Journal of Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Developing a measurement instrument for physical activity-related health literacy (PA-HL): results from an eDelphi and cognitive interviews

Elena Cramer, Thomas Hering, Kevin Dadaczynski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim Using the health literacy (HL) framework proposed by Sørensen et al. (BMC Public Health 12:80, 2012), this study aimed to develop a tool for measuring information processing competence focused on physical activity (PA). This paper presents results from an approach using the online Delphi (eDelphi) method along with cognitive interviews for the development of a comprehensive physical activity-related HL measurement instrument (PA-HL). Subject and methods PA is a major determinant in preventing noncommunicable diseases and promoting health. Access to and appropriate use of evidence-based PA information is important for making informed decisions favoring PA, particularly in cases of an overabundance of information. Here, a two-stage development process was applied: (1) A three-round eDelphi strategy was employed with HL and PA experts, where items were rated according to relevance and comprehensibility. Consensus was operationalized as an item content validity index; the second round incorporated an online group workshop. (2) Cognitive interviews were conducted with adult participants, utilizing think-aloud and probing techniques. The item pool was analyzed utilizing a questionnaire appraisal coding scheme. Results The preliminary measurement instrument consisted of 60 items. After revision through both stages, it was reduced to 33 items. Most changes addressed undefined terms and overly complex questions. Cognitive interviews suggested the addition of five items and clearly distinguishing between “apply” and “decide” competencies to ensure conceptual clarity. Conclusion The eDelphi study confirmed high content validity, while cognitive interviews demonstrated that most items were well understood but required linguistic simplification and shortening of lengthy or complex items. The item pool strongly focused on information processing competencies which involve decision-making, rather than behavior itself. Future research will psychometrically evaluate the PA-HL measurement instrument.

Journal of Public Health
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), University of Applied Sciences for Public Administration and Management (DE), Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.