Tree trunks do not bias estimates of surface fuels by aerial lidar in southern Sweden

Abstract Background Surface and ladder fuels play a significant role in controlling fire behavior, and their estimation is critical for fire modeling and management. Although airborne laser scanning (ALS) provides cost-effective, spatially explicit data on forest 3D structure, its utility for surface fuel estimation remains uncertain due to canopy occlusion and the presence of tree trunk points. We assessed the impact of tree trunk point filtering (TPF) on model performance for estimating surface fuel loads in strata within a vertical gradient of 0.0–2.0 m, which includes litter, herbaceous, and shrub layers. We used high-density ALS data (~ 2500 points m −2 ) from boreo-nemoral mixed forests in southern Sweden. We compared the performance of 438 LiDAR (lidar) metrics in characterizing surface fuels using parametric (linear and non-linear) and nonparametric (random forest — RF) regressions. Results There was no significant impact of TPF when comparing lidar-derived metric distributions and model performance under filter types, although a minor improvement was observed in the 0.5–2.0-m stratum. The performance of surface fuel strata modeling was the highest for the litter layer depth ( R 2 = 0.39) and moderate for the herbaceous layer and branch biomass ( R 2 = 0.26–0.28). The linear regression model consistently outperformed the RF model and showed slightly better performance than the nonlinear regression. We obtained a negligible positive impact of TPF ( ΔR 2 = 0.02) on predicting the litter layer depth utilizing the parametric regression approaches. Intensity-based metrics calculated using a minimum 5-m buffer radius were instrumental in modeling fuel layers within the 0.0–0.5-m stratum. Conclusions Removing tree trunk points did not affect the representation of surface fuels in airborne lidar data. We suggest, however, that the correct classification of ground and no-ground points and detection of objects such as boulders and deadwood can have a major effect on the adequate prediction of surface fuels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Ecology
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00454-y
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tree trunks do not bias estimates of surface fuels by aerial lidar in southern Sweden

Maksym Matsala, Roman Zadorozhniuk, Igor Drobyshev, Olga Wepryk
Fire Ecology
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Tree trunks do not bias estimates of surface fuels by aerial lidar in southern Sweden

Maksym Matsala, Roman Zadorozhniuk, Igor Drobyshev, Olga Wepryk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Surface and ladder fuels play a significant role in controlling fire behavior, and their estimation is critical for fire modeling and management. Although airborne laser scanning (ALS) provides cost-effective, spatially explicit data on forest 3D structure, its utility for surface fuel estimation remains uncertain due to canopy occlusion and the presence of tree trunk points. We assessed the impact of tree trunk point filtering (TPF) on model performance for estimating surface fuel loads in strata within a vertical gradient of 0.0–2.0 m, which includes litter, herbaceous, and shrub layers. We used high-density ALS data (~ 2500 points m −2 ) from boreo-nemoral mixed forests in southern Sweden. We compared the performance of 438 LiDAR (lidar) metrics in characterizing surface fuels using parametric (linear and non-linear) and nonparametric (random forest — RF) regressions. Results There was no significant impact of TPF when comparing lidar-derived metric distributions and model performance under filter types, although a minor improvement was observed in the 0.5–2.0-m stratum. The performance of surface fuel strata modeling was the highest for the litter layer depth ( R 2 = 0.39) and moderate for the herbaceous layer and branch biomass ( R 2 = 0.26–0.28). The linear regression model consistently outperformed the RF model and showed slightly better performance than the nonlinear regression. We obtained a negligible positive impact of TPF ( ΔR 2 = 0.02) on predicting the litter layer depth utilizing the parametric regression approaches. Intensity-based metrics calculated using a minimum 5-m buffer radius were instrumental in modeling fuel layers within the 0.0–0.5-m stratum. Conclusions Removing tree trunk points did not affect the representation of surface fuels in airborne lidar data. We suggest, however, that the correct classification of ground and no-ground points and detection of objects such as boulders and deadwood can have a major effect on the adequate prediction of surface fuels.

Fire EcologyVol. 22(1)
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.