Enhancing univariate time series forecasting: a general tree-based model selection approach

Abstract The selection of an appropriate forecasting method continues to be a pivotal topic among both theorists and practitioners, as more complex models do not always yield better results. In response, our study advances a pragmatic, data-driven approach for selecting the most suitable forecasting model, tailored to the unique attributes of specific time series data. This approach assesses 22 time series characteristics that span distribution, temporal statistics, and both linear and non-linear autocorrelations, as well as fluctuation analysis. Employing a decision-tree based framework that incorporates seven widely recognized forecasting methods—both parametric and non-parametric—our model facilitates an effective decision-making process among alternative forecasting methods. These methods include statistical and machine learning models, ensuring comprehensive and robust forecasting capabilities. We compare these models using Critical Difference Diagrams and find that some models have no statistically significant performance differences between them. Utilizing a comprehensive subset of the M3-Competition of approximately 2800 time series, which are from socio-economic domains and have a relatively low number of observations, our findings indicate that the decision-tree model reasonably selects an adequate forecasting model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Statistics
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-025-01703-5
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing univariate time series forecasting: a general tree-based model selection approach

Alexandru-Mihail Stroilă
Computational Statistics
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
article

Enhancing univariate time series forecasting: a general tree-based model selection approach

Alexandru-Mihail Stroilă
article en

Abstract

Abstract The selection of an appropriate forecasting method continues to be a pivotal topic among both theorists and practitioners, as more complex models do not always yield better results. In response, our study advances a pragmatic, data-driven approach for selecting the most suitable forecasting model, tailored to the unique attributes of specific time series data. This approach assesses 22 time series characteristics that span distribution, temporal statistics, and both linear and non-linear autocorrelations, as well as fluctuation analysis. Employing a decision-tree based framework that incorporates seven widely recognized forecasting methods—both parametric and non-parametric—our model facilitates an effective decision-making process among alternative forecasting methods. These methods include statistical and machine learning models, ensuring comprehensive and robust forecasting capabilities. We compare these models using Critical Difference Diagrams and find that some models have no statistically significant performance differences between them. Utilizing a comprehensive subset of the M3-Competition of approximately 2800 time series, which are from socio-economic domains and have a relatively low number of observations, our findings indicate that the decision-tree model reasonably selects an adequate forecasting model.

Computational StatisticsVol. 41(3)
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.