The flexibility paradox: co-creating flexible work arrangements amid socio-cultural, structural and equity tensions

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how working parents in the urban Indian Information Technology workforce navigate, perceive and negotiate flexibility at the workplace while balancing childcare responsibilities. It explores the co-construction of flexibility and the socio-cultural, structural and emotional factors influencing its accessibility and impact. Design/methodology/approach Based on a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with 36 employees across diverse urban information technology firms in India, using thematic analysis and Gioia's inductive data structuring approach, the study identifies how individual agency, organisational culture and policy enactments interact in shaping flexible working arrangements. Findings Four themes emerged from the findings: (1) collaborative construction of flexible arrangements, (2) socio-cultural impediments to equitable flexibility, (3) structural and power-based constraints and (4) social and emotional tensions in flexibility implementations. While participants reported appreciation for flexible working options, they also encountered guilt, performance mistrust and managerial gatekeeping. Flexibility was both a support system and a hidden stressor, particularly for new parents in dual-career households. These pioneers “controlled flexibility” as a hybrid extension of I-deals for collectivist contexts, revealing novel inequities. Research limitations/implications The study focuses on the urban Information Technology workforce, and findings may not fully generalise to other sectors or national cultures. Future research could incorporate a longitudinal design or comparative cross-sector analysis. Originality/value The study contributes to organisational behaviour and HRM literature by exposing the “flexibility paradox” and advancing an understanding of how flexibility can become a site of negotiation, exclusion and emotional strain in culturally complex workplaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Review
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-05-2025-0441
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The flexibility paradox: co-creating flexible work arrangements amid socio-cultural, structural and equity tensions

Juman Iqbal, Vimal Babu, Hafsah Syeda
Personnel Review
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

The flexibility paradox: co-creating flexible work arrangements amid socio-cultural, structural and equity tensions

Juman Iqbal, Vimal Babu, Hafsah Syeda
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine how working parents in the urban Indian Information Technology workforce navigate, perceive and negotiate flexibility at the workplace while balancing childcare responsibilities. It explores the co-construction of flexibility and the socio-cultural, structural and emotional factors influencing its accessibility and impact. Design/methodology/approach Based on a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with 36 employees across diverse urban information technology firms in India, using thematic analysis and Gioia's inductive data structuring approach, the study identifies how individual agency, organisational culture and policy enactments interact in shaping flexible working arrangements. Findings Four themes emerged from the findings: (1) collaborative construction of flexible arrangements, (2) socio-cultural impediments to equitable flexibility, (3) structural and power-based constraints and (4) social and emotional tensions in flexibility implementations. While participants reported appreciation for flexible working options, they also encountered guilt, performance mistrust and managerial gatekeeping. Flexibility was both a support system and a hidden stressor, particularly for new parents in dual-career households. These pioneers “controlled flexibility” as a hybrid extension of I-deals for collectivist contexts, revealing novel inequities. Research limitations/implications The study focuses on the urban Information Technology workforce, and findings may not fully generalise to other sectors or national cultures. Future research could incorporate a longitudinal design or comparative cross-sector analysis. Originality/value The study contributes to organisational behaviour and HRM literature by exposing the “flexibility paradox” and advancing an understanding of how flexibility can become a site of negotiation, exclusion and emotional strain in culturally complex workplaces.

Personnel Review
SRM University (IN), Indian Institute of Management Visakhapatnam (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.