Abstract PS2-04-23: Poor response to systemic therapy upon progression on cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in HR+ Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Abstract BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer, which exhibits an aggressive clinical course regardless of stage at diagnosis or molecular subtype. We have previously reported on the suboptimal outcomes and high recurrence rates of patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) IBC, and notably have reported short duration of response to standard of care CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKI) in the first line metastatic setting. Herein, we report time on treatment (ToT) on systemic therapies in the 2nd line metastatic setting for patients with HR+ IBC. METHODS: Patients with HR+ HER2- IBC for which CDKI was administered in the first line metastatic setting were identified from the IBC registry at MD Anderson Cancer Center (N = 36). Patients unable to tolerate CDKI therapy were excluded from this analysis (N = 3). Therapies utilized and ToT (months) in the 2nd line setting was evaluated as reported by the treating physician. RESULTS: Among N = 33 patients evaluated, upon progression on standard of care CDKI and endocrine directed therapy (ET) combinations, patients received the following therapies with median ToT (months (min-max ToT)), respectively: capecitabine (N = 7; 3 (2-5)), everolimus/ET (N = 6, 3 (1-4)), Abraxane (N = 3, 3(2-10)), Eribulin (N = 2, 2.5(2-3)), capivasertib/fulvestrant (N = 1, 6(6)), taxol (N = 1, 5(5)), elacestrant (N = 1, 3(3)), fulvestrant (N = 1, 3(3)), tamoxifen (N = 1, 1(1)), intrathecal topotecan (N = 1, 1(1)), non standard/clinical trial (N = 4, 2.5(1-4)). Notably, 5 patients (15%) succumbed to death while on first line CDKI therapy due to progression of disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic HR+ IBC demonstrate poor response to ET and cytotoxic chemotherapies upon progression on first line standard CDKI/ET, with a disproportionately high rate of death occurring in the first line setting due to advanced disease. Given previously reported low ToT on CDKI/ET in the first line and high incidence of brain relapse in this population, clinical trial design utilizing targeted therapies and more novel approaches in earlier settings are worthy of consideration. Citation Format: A. Nasrazadani, M. Kai, R. Tidwell, B. Lim, V. Valero, R. Layman, The MDACC Inflammatory Breast Cancer Team, W. Woodward. Poor response to systemic therapy upon progression on cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in HR+ Inflammatory Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-04-23.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-04-23
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS2-04-23: Poor response to systemic therapy upon progression on cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in HR+ Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Megumi Kai, A. Nasrazadani, V. Valero, W. Woodward et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS2-04-23: Poor response to systemic therapy upon progression on cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in HR+ Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Megumi Kai, A. Nasrazadani, V. Valero, W. Woodward, B. Lim, R. M. Layman, R. Tidwell
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer, which exhibits an aggressive clinical course regardless of stage at diagnosis or molecular subtype. We have previously reported on the suboptimal outcomes and high recurrence rates of patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) IBC, and notably have reported short duration of response to standard of care CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKI) in the first line metastatic setting. Herein, we report time on treatment (ToT) on systemic therapies in the 2nd line metastatic setting for patients with HR+ IBC. METHODS: Patients with HR+ HER2- IBC for which CDKI was administered in the first line metastatic setting were identified from the IBC registry at MD Anderson Cancer Center (N = 36). Patients unable to tolerate CDKI therapy were excluded from this analysis (N = 3). Therapies utilized and ToT (months) in the 2nd line setting was evaluated as reported by the treating physician. RESULTS: Among N = 33 patients evaluated, upon progression on standard of care CDKI and endocrine directed therapy (ET) combinations, patients received the following therapies with median ToT (months (min-max ToT)), respectively: capecitabine (N = 7; 3 (2-5)), everolimus/ET (N = 6, 3 (1-4)), Abraxane (N = 3, 3(2-10)), Eribulin (N = 2, 2.5(2-3)), capivasertib/fulvestrant (N = 1, 6(6)), taxol (N = 1, 5(5)), elacestrant (N = 1, 3(3)), fulvestrant (N = 1, 3(3)), tamoxifen (N = 1, 1(1)), intrathecal topotecan (N = 1, 1(1)), non standard/clinical trial (N = 4, 2.5(1-4)). Notably, 5 patients (15%) succumbed to death while on first line CDKI therapy due to progression of disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic HR+ IBC demonstrate poor response to ET and cytotoxic chemotherapies upon progression on first line standard CDKI/ET, with a disproportionately high rate of death occurring in the first line setting due to advanced disease. Given previously reported low ToT on CDKI/ET in the first line and high incidence of brain relapse in this population, clinical trial design utilizing targeted therapies and more novel approaches in earlier settings are worthy of consideration. Citation Format: A. Nasrazadani, M. Kai, R. Tidwell, B. Lim, V. Valero, R. Layman, The MDACC Inflammatory Breast Cancer Team, W. Woodward. Poor response to systemic therapy upon progression on cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in HR+ Inflammatory Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-04-23.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.