Mental health benefits of specific blue space types and characteristics: A systematic evidence map

Natural environments support mental health and wellbeing, yet limited evidence exists about which types or characteristics are most beneficial. This is particularly true for blue spaces (natural or manmade outdoor environments featuring water). This evidence map investigates the mental health and wellbeing benefits associated with specific blue space types (e.g. coast, river) and characteristics (e.g. sounds). Following PRISMA guidelines, specific keywords were used to search for articles published from inception to March 2025. A total of 139 papers were included, examining the relationships between specific blue space types or characteristics and mental health. Coastal environments were the most frequently studied blue space (94 studies). Affect was the most assessed mental health outcome (74 studies). Most studies were conducted in European and Asian countries. Most studies compared blue spaces to urban or a green space environments, rather than other blue spaces. Only six studies directly compared different blue space types within the same study. Overall, the current evidence base does not allow for comparisons between different blue space types or characteristics, due to the limited number of direct comparisons and substantial heterogeneity across study designs, outcome measures, geographical contexts, blue space descriptions, and study populations. Future research should prioritize direct comparisons between different blue spaces, preferably including the detailed descriptions and analyses of specific characteristics, and examine the role of amount and type of exposure to better inform evidence-based recommendations for blue spaces and mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2026.124054
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health benefits of specific blue space types and characteristics: A systematic evidence map

ZG Davies, A. Olszewska-Guizzo, L. O’Brien, A. Russo et al.
Environmental Research
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Mental health benefits of specific blue space types and characteristics: A systematic evidence map

ZG Davies, A. Olszewska-Guizzo, L. O’Brien, A. Russo, R. Remmen, F. Beute, M.B. Andreucci, M.R. Marselle, A. Lammel, H. Keune, S. de Vries, J. Glanville
article en

Abstract

Natural environments support mental health and wellbeing, yet limited evidence exists about which types or characteristics are most beneficial. This is particularly true for blue spaces (natural or manmade outdoor environments featuring water). This evidence map investigates the mental health and wellbeing benefits associated with specific blue space types (e.g. coast, river) and characteristics (e.g. sounds). Following PRISMA guidelines, specific keywords were used to search for articles published from inception to March 2025. A total of 139 papers were included, examining the relationships between specific blue space types or characteristics and mental health. Coastal environments were the most frequently studied blue space (94 studies). Affect was the most assessed mental health outcome (74 studies). Most studies were conducted in European and Asian countries. Most studies compared blue spaces to urban or a green space environments, rather than other blue spaces. Only six studies directly compared different blue space types within the same study. Overall, the current evidence base does not allow for comparisons between different blue space types or characteristics, due to the limited number of direct comparisons and substantial heterogeneity across study designs, outcome measures, geographical contexts, blue space descriptions, and study populations. Future research should prioritize direct comparisons between different blue spaces, preferably including the detailed descriptions and analyses of specific characteristics, and examine the role of amount and type of exposure to better inform evidence-based recommendations for blue spaces and mental health.

Environmental ResearchVol. 297
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Antwerp (BE), Vincennes University (US), Queensland University of Technology (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), University of Kent (GB), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Forest Research (GB), Université Paris 8 (FR), University of York (GB), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission, University of Surrey, Universiteit Antwerpen
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.