Abstract PS1-02-02: Long-term worry after early-stage breast cancer diagnosis: longitudinal study of a population-based cohort

Abstract Background/Purpose: Worry influences treatment decision-making, surveillance behaviors, and quality of life of people with cancer. The long-term experience of worry among patients with early-stage breast cancer requires better understanding and validated instruments for efficient measurement. Methods: ICanCare enrolled 2502 women with early-stage breast cancer, diagnosed in 2013-15 and reported to Georgia and Los Angeles SEER registries, who responded to surveys in the year of diagnosis (T1). After excluding those deceased, too ill, or otherwise unable to participate, 2361 were sent follow-up surveys in 2021-22 (T2), of whom 1412 responded. We asked at both times, “During the past month, how often has worrying about your cancer coming back”: 1) “made you feel upset”; 2) “made it difficult for you to carry out your usual daily activities at home or at work”; 3) “made you feel distant from family and friends.” Response options were “almost never,” “rarely,” “sometimes,” “often,” or “almost always.” A scaled measure across the 3 items was developed using factor analysis and evaluated for internal consistency and validity in bivariate analyses with tumor and patient characteristics, using Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis tests for all variables (categorical) except age (continuous), which was compared using Spearman’s correlation. The 3-item scale was also compared using Spearman’s correlation to a single item asking, “In the past month, how often have you worried about your breast cancer coming back?” Results: Table 1 shows responses among the 1165 without recurrence or second cancer at T2. Over 1 in 5 respondents (27.6% at T1 and 21.1% at T2) endorsed that worry about their cancer coming back made them feel upset at least sometimes. Factor analysis retained a one-factor solution. Cronbach’s alpha for the scale was 0.87 at T1 & 0.82 at T2. Scaled scores had mean (SD) of 1.64 (.83) at T1 and 1.43 (.67) at T2; median (IQR) 1.33 (1.00-2.00) at T1 and 1.00 (1.00-1.67) at T2. Scaled scores were higher among patients with higher stage (p=.009 at T1 and .007 at T2) and those who were younger (p<0.001 at T1 and T2), Asian and Latina (p<.0001 at T1 and T2), with lower education (p=.003 at T1, p<0.0001 at T2), divorced/separated or never married (p=.0007 at T2 only), and with lowest income (p=.002 at T2 only). At T1, the mean score on the single item was 2.16 (SD 1.13), with 37.8% worrying sometimes or more; at T2, the mean was 2.1 (SD 1.08), and 38.3% worried sometimes or more. The 3-item scale correlated with the single item (correlation coefficients T1: .71, p<.001; T2: .67, p<.001). Conclusions: Three-item and single-item measures of worry appear valid for assessing patients with early-stage breast cancer, suggesting that >1 in 5 patients has worries that extend well beyond 5 years after diagnosis. Recognizing patient and tumor characteristics associated with long-term worry may help target resources and supportive interventions. Citation Format: R. Jagsi, A. Furgal, S. Pottow, S. Hawley, L. Wallner. Long-term worry after early-stage breast cancer diagnosis: longitudinal study of a population-based cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-02-02.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-02-02
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS1-02-02: Long-term worry after early-stage breast cancer diagnosis: longitudinal study of a population-based cohort

Lauren P. Wallner, Allison Furgal, S. Hawley, S. Pottow
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS1-02-02: Long-term worry after early-stage breast cancer diagnosis: longitudinal study of a population-based cohort

Lauren P. Wallner, Allison Furgal, S. Hawley, S. Pottow
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background/Purpose: Worry influences treatment decision-making, surveillance behaviors, and quality of life of people with cancer. The long-term experience of worry among patients with early-stage breast cancer requires better understanding and validated instruments for efficient measurement. Methods: ICanCare enrolled 2502 women with early-stage breast cancer, diagnosed in 2013-15 and reported to Georgia and Los Angeles SEER registries, who responded to surveys in the year of diagnosis (T1). After excluding those deceased, too ill, or otherwise unable to participate, 2361 were sent follow-up surveys in 2021-22 (T2), of whom 1412 responded. We asked at both times, “During the past month, how often has worrying about your cancer coming back”: 1) “made you feel upset”; 2) “made it difficult for you to carry out your usual daily activities at home or at work”; 3) “made you feel distant from family and friends.” Response options were “almost never,” “rarely,” “sometimes,” “often,” or “almost always.” A scaled measure across the 3 items was developed using factor analysis and evaluated for internal consistency and validity in bivariate analyses with tumor and patient characteristics, using Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis tests for all variables (categorical) except age (continuous), which was compared using Spearman’s correlation. The 3-item scale was also compared using Spearman’s correlation to a single item asking, “In the past month, how often have you worried about your breast cancer coming back?” Results: Table 1 shows responses among the 1165 without recurrence or second cancer at T2. Over 1 in 5 respondents (27.6% at T1 and 21.1% at T2) endorsed that worry about their cancer coming back made them feel upset at least sometimes. Factor analysis retained a one-factor solution. Cronbach’s alpha for the scale was 0.87 at T1 & 0.82 at T2. Scaled scores had mean (SD) of 1.64 (.83) at T1 and 1.43 (.67) at T2; median (IQR) 1.33 (1.00-2.00) at T1 and 1.00 (1.00-1.67) at T2. Scaled scores were higher among patients with higher stage (p=.009 at T1 and .007 at T2) and those who were younger (p<0.001 at T1 and T2), Asian and Latina (p<.0001 at T1 and T2), with lower education (p=.003 at T1, p<0.0001 at T2), divorced/separated or never married (p=.0007 at T2 only), and with lowest income (p=.002 at T2 only). At T1, the mean score on the single item was 2.16 (SD 1.13), with 37.8% worrying sometimes or more; at T2, the mean was 2.1 (SD 1.08), and 38.3% worried sometimes or more. The 3-item scale correlated with the single item (correlation coefficients T1: .71, p<.001; T2: .67, p<.001). Conclusions: Three-item and single-item measures of worry appear valid for assessing patients with early-stage breast cancer, suggesting that >1 in 5 patients has worries that extend well beyond 5 years after diagnosis. Recognizing patient and tumor characteristics associated with long-term worry may help target resources and supportive interventions. Citation Format: R. Jagsi, A. Furgal, S. Pottow, S. Hawley, L. Wallner. Long-term worry after early-stage breast cancer diagnosis: longitudinal study of a population-based cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-02-02.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Emory University (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.