Abstract PS3-02-14: Incidental Histopathological Findings in Risk Reducing Breast Surgery: A Cross Sectional Study

Abstract Purpose: Risk-reducing breast surgery (RRBS) is an established preventive strategy for women at high genetic or familial risk of breast cancer. Histopathological evaluation of RRBS specimens may reveal incidental findings (IFs), including occult malignancies and precursor lesions, but their prevalence and predictors remain insufficiently described. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of IFs and identify associated risk factors in a Brazilian cohort. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 154 women who underwent RRBS at a tertiary public cancer center in Brazil between 2013 and 2025. Eligible patients carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants and/or fulfilled NCCN high-risk criteria. Histopathological assessment followed an institutional protocol with extensive tissue sampling. Logistic regression models evaluated demographic, clinical, and surgical predictors of IFs. Results: IFs were identified in 35% (54/154) of patients, including atypical proliferations (70%), DCIS (22%), and invasive neoplasia (8%). On multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.071) and bilateral mastectomy (OR 3.27) were significant independent predictors of IFs. For invasive and DCIS findings, age was the only significant factor (OR 1.069). Genetic status showed no significant association. Conclusion: This study reports the highest prevalence of IFs in RRBS specimens to date, largely attributable to the comprehensive sampling protocol. Associations with clinical characteristics, particularly age, contrast with the absence of correlation between negative genetic testing and reduced risk. These findings highlight the importance of integrating detailed clinical and familial risk assessment into surgical decision-making, especially in resource-limited systems with restricted access to genetic testing. Citation Format: T. Fernandes, D. Silva, A. O. Magalhaes, B. Duarte, A. cabello, S. Ramalho, L. R. da Silva, G. Paiva, r. torresan, F. Brenelli, M. Minari, T. Gaspar, A. Viaro, S. Teixeira, M. Faucz, C. Alem, C. Cabello. Incidental Histopathological Findings in Risk Reducing Breast Surgery: A Cross Sectional Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-02-14.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-02-14
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-02-14: Incidental Histopathological Findings in Risk Reducing Breast Surgery: A Cross Sectional Study

Christine Elisabete Rubio Alem, Ana Lídia Viaro, César Cabello, Monique Possari Minari et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS3-02-14: Incidental Histopathological Findings in Risk Reducing Breast Surgery: A Cross Sectional Study

Christine Elisabete Rubio Alem, Ana Lídia Viaro, César Cabello, Monique Possari Minari, Susana Ramalho, T. Gáspár, S. R. Teixeira, L. R. da Silva, M. Faucz, A. O. Magalhaes, D. I. Silva, r. torresan, F. Brenelli, A. R. cabello, G. S. Paiva, B. N. Duarte, T. Fernandes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Risk-reducing breast surgery (RRBS) is an established preventive strategy for women at high genetic or familial risk of breast cancer. Histopathological evaluation of RRBS specimens may reveal incidental findings (IFs), including occult malignancies and precursor lesions, but their prevalence and predictors remain insufficiently described. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of IFs and identify associated risk factors in a Brazilian cohort. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 154 women who underwent RRBS at a tertiary public cancer center in Brazil between 2013 and 2025. Eligible patients carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants and/or fulfilled NCCN high-risk criteria. Histopathological assessment followed an institutional protocol with extensive tissue sampling. Logistic regression models evaluated demographic, clinical, and surgical predictors of IFs. Results: IFs were identified in 35% (54/154) of patients, including atypical proliferations (70%), DCIS (22%), and invasive neoplasia (8%). On multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.071) and bilateral mastectomy (OR 3.27) were significant independent predictors of IFs. For invasive and DCIS findings, age was the only significant factor (OR 1.069). Genetic status showed no significant association. Conclusion: This study reports the highest prevalence of IFs in RRBS specimens to date, largely attributable to the comprehensive sampling protocol. Associations with clinical characteristics, particularly age, contrast with the absence of correlation between negative genetic testing and reduced risk. These findings highlight the importance of integrating detailed clinical and familial risk assessment into surgical decision-making, especially in resource-limited systems with restricted access to genetic testing. Citation Format: T. Fernandes, D. Silva, A. O. Magalhaes, B. Duarte, A. cabello, S. Ramalho, L. R. da Silva, G. Paiva, r. torresan, F. Brenelli, M. Minari, T. Gaspar, A. Viaro, S. Teixeira, M. Faucz, C. Alem, C. Cabello. Incidental Histopathological Findings in Risk Reducing Breast Surgery: A Cross Sectional Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-02-14.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.