Abstract PS5-10-23: Assessing Clinical and Sociodemographic Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy at an Urban Tertiary Care Center

Abstract Background: The rate of patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for unilateral breast cancer has been rising dramatically despite emerging guidelines which discourage CPM in low-risk patients due to lack of survival benefit. The decision to undergo CPM is personal and often multi-factorial, and has not been well-studied. This study aimed to identify clinical and sociological factors associated with the decision to pursue CPM in an urban, underserved community. Methods: A retrospective review of 259 patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent mastectomy from 2012-2025 at a tertiary care hospital system was performed. Variables included sociodemographic and clinical features. Primary outcome was rate of CPM. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS. Results: Total rate of CPM in our population was 29% (n=75) and total rate of reconstruction was 18% (n=47). No male patients (n=9) underwent CPM, whereas rate of CPM in female patients was 30% (p=0.0627). Among female patients, patients who underwent CPM were on average 13.6 years younger than controls (p < 0.001). Having private insurance vs. public insurance (p=0.084) and being currently employed vs. unemployed (p=0.073) trended towards significance for association with CPM. Among clinical factors, undergoing surgical reconstruction (p=0.002), and undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.001) were associated with CPM. There was no significant association between CPM and racial or ethnic group, tumor size, histologic subtype, clinical stage, or hormone receptor positivity. Conclusion: In our urban population, social factors such as age, insurance status, and employment status and whether patients additionally underwent surgical reconstruction or neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy may play a role in the decision to undergo CPM. In management of patients with unilateral breast cancer, surgeons may consider such nuances in patient decision-making when guiding conversations surrounding CPM. Citation Format: A. D. Simoni, R. Greenbaum, S. Harbour, S. L. Jao, M. P. McEvoy. Assessing Clinical and Sociodemographic Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy at an Urban Tertiary Care Center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-10-23.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-10-23
Primary Topic
Male Breast Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS5-10-23: Assessing Clinical and Sociodemographic Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy at an Urban Tertiary Care Center

Raena Greenbaum, A. D. Simoni, M. P. McEvoy, S. Harbour et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Male Breast Health Studies
article

Abstract PS5-10-23: Assessing Clinical and Sociodemographic Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy at an Urban Tertiary Care Center

Raena Greenbaum, A. D. Simoni, M. P. McEvoy, S. Harbour, S. L. Jao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The rate of patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for unilateral breast cancer has been rising dramatically despite emerging guidelines which discourage CPM in low-risk patients due to lack of survival benefit. The decision to undergo CPM is personal and often multi-factorial, and has not been well-studied. This study aimed to identify clinical and sociological factors associated with the decision to pursue CPM in an urban, underserved community. Methods: A retrospective review of 259 patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent mastectomy from 2012-2025 at a tertiary care hospital system was performed. Variables included sociodemographic and clinical features. Primary outcome was rate of CPM. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS. Results: Total rate of CPM in our population was 29% (n=75) and total rate of reconstruction was 18% (n=47). No male patients (n=9) underwent CPM, whereas rate of CPM in female patients was 30% (p=0.0627). Among female patients, patients who underwent CPM were on average 13.6 years younger than controls (p < 0.001). Having private insurance vs. public insurance (p=0.084) and being currently employed vs. unemployed (p=0.073) trended towards significance for association with CPM. Among clinical factors, undergoing surgical reconstruction (p=0.002), and undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.001) were associated with CPM. There was no significant association between CPM and racial or ethnic group, tumor size, histologic subtype, clinical stage, or hormone receptor positivity. Conclusion: In our urban population, social factors such as age, insurance status, and employment status and whether patients additionally underwent surgical reconstruction or neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy may play a role in the decision to undergo CPM. In management of patients with unilateral breast cancer, surgeons may consider such nuances in patient decision-making when guiding conversations surrounding CPM. Citation Format: A. D. Simoni, R. Greenbaum, S. Harbour, S. L. Jao, M. P. McEvoy. Assessing Clinical and Sociodemographic Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy at an Urban Tertiary Care Center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-10-23.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Male Breast Health Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.